User talk:JBFree88

This is JBFree88's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Stephanie Carlisi has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stephanie Carlisi. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 03:07, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stephanie Carlisi[edit]

Needs a lot more coverage in reliable secondary sources. Rather than using the Futurism source, try using the actual article from the New York Times. The contraversery about trade marks with Apple are not sufficient to justify notability. Interviews and press releases with/by Carlisi are all primary sources and therefore not independent sources - need to be verified by reliable secondary sources. Have there been any reviews of her music in notable sources (i.e. music magazines/newspapers etc). Check WP:MUSICBIO for the criteria on establishing notability. Let me know if you need any help as you work on it. Dan arndt (talk) 05:29, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephanie Carlisi (January 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:MUSICBIO, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stephanie Carlisi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:38, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JBFree88! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:38, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stephanie Carlisi[edit]

Hello, JBFree88. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stephanie Carlisi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]