User talk:JMeditor101

Welcome!

Hello, JMeditor101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 01:14, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Your recent editing history at Scott Odenbach shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. KidAd • SPEAK 23:39, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly you are an immature KID. You are the one that changed MY original post, more than 3 times. I have tried to get you to look at other similiar pages and you would see that there are 100 examples on my side of the argument and ZERO on your side, but instead you don't do any research, you act like a bully and keep changing it and now threaten me here. Talk about an immature person. I will not be bullied, you are acting completely inappropriately.JMeditor101 (talk) 02:32, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

JMeditor101, Your edits violate WP:BODY, which states, Articles longer than a stub are generally divided into sections. Because Scott Odenbach is a stub, creating additional sections is unnecessary and incorrect. Also, you have repeatedly edit-warred this change, which uses strange formatting and random capital letters. Is "Election History" a proper noun? Why is it capitalized? Also, why is there such a significant space between the "Career" and "Election History" sections? As I have said many times, you have violated WP:ONUS, which states The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content. That does not mean name-calling or WP:INCIVILITY. It means you are responsible for going to the article's talk page and gaining consensus for your changes. 02:42, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I appericate the work you been doing by creating South Dakota politicians, if you're going to put a Election History section by adding the election results, atleast use the election template or copy and paste from this article of the 2020 South Dakota House of Representatives election results. Even though I'm not familiar with WP:ONUS and it's full understanding, I just know for the election selection to use a election template. It makes it easier to read as I added one to the article you worked on (Scott Odenbach) to solve the dispute. Dillon251992 (talk) 18:11, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation[edit]

Hallo, Thank you for creating Margaret Sutton (politician) . When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Margaret Sutton ), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 06:44, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi JMeditor101, I hope you are doing well. I'm Blablubbs, and I'm an SPI clerk. A user has filed a sockpuppet investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JMeditor101 that alleges that you may be using multiple accounts, which is not inherently a bad thing, but should usually be disclosed. Could you please leave a comment in the "Comments by other users" section to clarify what relationship, if any, you have to Massiveeffects101? Thank you in advance. --Blablubbs (talk) 12:39, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]