User talk:JNCampbell5

This is JNCampbell5's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: John G. Dooley (Track Announcer) (August 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The whole article is written too much like a story instead of an encyclopedic entry, please rewrite it in a neutral tone, consider using existing articles of other contemporary track announcers as reference on how can a formal neutral tone can be established.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John G. Dooley (Track Announcer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 22:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JNCampbell5! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tutwakhamoe (talk) 22:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John G. Dooley (Track Announcer) (August 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

HorseRacing.net is a betting website so not a reliable source. It appears you wrote the cited article so please see the conflict of interest guidelines. Interviews/his comments are not independent nor are press releases so cannot be used to establish notability and see this about using YouTube. Primary sources (which includes interviews/his comments) should only be used sparingly to support content.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John G. Dooley (Track Announcer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:43, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John G. Dooley (Track Announcer) (August 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Some of the sources make no mention of Dooley so not useful and should be removed along with any content attributed to them unless other sources can be found. In addition, anything that cannot be reliable sourced should be removed. You cannot use your own knowledge (see WP:OR) for content. You can use your knowledge for research purposes but a Wikipedia article should only summarize what reliable secondary source have written. For notable calls, need secondary reliable sources that written about them. I did a quick search on ProQuest and appears there at least some newspaper sources (Arlington Heights Daily Herald for example) but not sure how in-depth they are about him. There's likely at least some at Newspapers.com.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John G. Dooley (Track Announcer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 14:43, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and notability[edit]

Hi JNCampbell5, I started a discussion at Draft talk:John G. Dooley (Track Announcer) so join me there. S0091 (talk) 14:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And if you have a conflict of interest (read that), you need to declare it. Having a COI does not preclude you from working on/submitting the draft but transparency is key. S0091 (talk) 14:52, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See Draft talk:John G. Dooley where JNCampbell5 affirms there is no COI. S0091 (talk) 20:52, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John G. Dooley has been accepted[edit]

John G. Dooley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

voorts (talk/contributions) 23:46, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]