User talk:JackMack67

Speedy deletion nomination of NLR (Nous sommes la résistance) Australian Prepper Organisation[edit]

Hello JackMack67,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged NLR (Nous sommes la résistance) Australian Prepper Organisation for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 09:01, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of NLR (Nous sommes la résistance) Australian Prepper Organisation[edit]

Hello JackMack67,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged NLR (Nous sommes la résistance) Australian Prepper Organisation for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 10:03, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of NLR (Nous sommes la résistance) Australian Prepper Organisation[edit]

Hello JackMack67,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged NLR (Nous sommes la résistance) Australian Prepper Organisation for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 10:31, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:JackMack67[edit]

Hello JackMack67,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged User:JackMack67 for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 10:33, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I did not realize my user page was an article, I though it was just a trial page. Sorry

Deletion discussion about NLR (Nous sommes la résistance) Australian Prepper Organisation[edit]

Hello, JackMack67,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether NLR (Nous sommes la résistance) Australian Prepper Organisation should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NLR (Nous sommes la résistance) Australian Prepper Organisation .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Barney the barney barney (talk) 11:01, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, it is a bit clearer now.

Pros For NLR article to not be deleted[edit]

I just re did all of my citations for the article, it should be a bit clearer and I had some inter changeable language that I changed in it. I hope the citations are adequate, I also cited all of the manuals mentioned. Thanks All JackMack67 (talk) 13:48, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, here's to summarise:

No original research. You cannot interview yourself about your secret society.
Verifiability. Generally means reliable sources about the subject, for example in local newspapers. None has been provided. Again, you cannot interview yourself about your secret society.
[[WP:COI|No conflicts of interest (advertising). It seems you have one.
WP:AFD - your article is at articles for deletion. It will be discussed by other editors. The first editor's reaction was "WTF?". IMHO, the most likely outcome is that it will be speedily snow deleted, for being rubbish, but you can try to discuss it there (please don't use the socks, or you will definitely get blocked).

Thanks. Barney the barney barney (talk) 14:26, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Trasel (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:45, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]