User talk:Jackstarrzz

June 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Love Island (2015 TV series). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ThisIsDanny (talk) 15:15, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SCD series 13

Why did you remove my edit. I am really annoyed by this! I am NOT a vandal nor have I ever been one. I am a reputable editor on these wiki pages. NaThang0P (talk) 12:56, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because the show hasn't started and it's not yet needed.

But you have just done it all yourself so the deletion of my table was not really needed was it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by NaThang0P (talk • contribs) 13:31, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes as it was in a different style to the Week 1 table.

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tristan MacManus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Charleston and Salsa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Brendan O'Carroll.png

Thanks for uploading File:Brendan O'Carroll.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Note that since the subject is a living person, a free image could reasonably be found. kelapstick^(bainuu) 20:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Giovanni Pernice

added a link pointing to Rumba

Gleb Savchenko

added a link pointing to Charleston

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anita Rani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charleston. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheApprenticeSeriesElevenCandidates.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheApprenticeSeriesElevenCandidates.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 05:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Giovanni Pernice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Samba (dance). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm A Celebrity

If you look back at previous years, you will see as the series happened it included the celebrity's full name in the side bar. Look back at previous edits, an IP changed this and it was not reverted back. ThisIsDanny (talk) 16:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (UK series 15). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
I'm warning you now not to do this again or you could end up being blocked, and we want to avoid that. To resolve the issue, please go on the talk page and discuss it, rather than just reverting. Thanks for your co-operation Class455fan1 (talk) 09:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Leecartereastenders.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Leecartereastenders.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Celebrity Big Brother 17 eye logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Celebrity Big Brother 17 eye logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 00:03, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:LaurenGoodger.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:LaurenGoodger.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 18:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LaurenGoodger.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LaurenGoodger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Leecartereastenders.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Leecartereastenders.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Got What It Takes?

Hi, I'm Denver20. Jackstarrzz, thanks for creating Got What It Takes?!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please link these to some other links.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Denver F. 16:55, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Your addition to List of Mrs. Brown's Boys episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Diff: [1] Content you added in this edit can be found here and here and so on. Point is: you didn't write it. This is plagiarism, which is academically dishonest and lazy. If you add lifted prose like this again, I will interrupt your editing privileges. In addition, you made changes to dates without providing references. Please don't submit unsourced content again. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It also seems fairly obvious to me that you're editing while logged out, especially since you restored problematic copyright violations at List of Mrs. Brown's Boys episodes that were submitted from IP 94.4.211.125. Since you did this after I'd protected the article, it looks an awful lot like you are using an autoconfirmed account to skirt past article protection, which would constitute sockpuppetry. Please don't do this. It will result in both your account and your IP being blocked. Since you have an account, you should only be editing from that account. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Agnes Brown.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Agnes Brown.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Leecartereastenders.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Leecartereastenders.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ClaudetteHubbard.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ClaudetteHubbard.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at List of Mrs. Brown's Boys episodes. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:08, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Agnes Brown.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Agnes Brown.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:LaurenGoodger.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:LaurenGoodger.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 21:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Brendan O'Carroll.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Brendan O'Carroll.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 21:04, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Brendan O'Carroll and wife.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Brendan O'Carroll and wife.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 21:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Brendan O'Carroll and wife.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Brendan O'Carroll and wife.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 23:19, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:StephBritton.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:StephBritton.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Brendan O'Carroll and wife.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Brendan O'Carroll and wife.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –Davey2010^Talk 16:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Don't add the copyvio image to Jennifer Gibney again. And please don't edit logged out to evade scrutiny. Bishonen | talk 19:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

April 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jennifer Gibney. –Davey2010^Talk 19:50, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 20:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jennifer Gibney.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Jennifer Gibney.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –Davey2010^Talk 18:24, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:JaniceGarvey.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:JaniceGarvey.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –Davey2010^Talk 18:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 18:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Brendan O'Carroll and wife.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Brendan O'Carroll and wife.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –Davey2010^Talk 10:43, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:BasilBrushTitles.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:BasilBrushTitles.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BasilBrushTitles.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BasilBrushTitles.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jackstarrzz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Nokia Lumia 530.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Nokia Lumia 530.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shritwod (talk) 22:58, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Agnes Brown.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Agnes Brown.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jackstarrzz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i’d like to apply for the standard offer, I’ve made 0 edits for the past six months.

Decline reason:

That's good to hear, but it does not address the reason for the block. We'd really like to hear about your understanding of copyright law, and how you will avoid the problems that led to dozens of warnings and several blocks. Kuru (talk) 01:04, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jackstarrzz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, i’d Like to apply for the standard offer. I was blocked for edit warring over a year ago, and I’ve made no edits for a year. If you look through my contributions you can see the majority of them are constructive, and I enjoy editing Wikipedia, after a year of not editing, I will make sure this behaviour will not occur again

Decline reason:

As per above. We need to be sure you understand exactly what Wikipedia's copyright and fair-use policies mean. You haven't discussed this at all in either unblock request. Yamla (talk) 20:13, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jackstarrzz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, as you can see in my requests above, I was blocked over a year ago for Copyright Violations, i’d Like to apply for the standard offer. As a user stated above, I have now read through the wikipedia copyright and fair use policies. This time around I will MAKE SURE that I check the copyright of an image, to avoid copyright violation. I haven’t made any edits for over a year, and intend to return to constructive editing, as you can see my contributions have been constructive, the reason I was blocked was copyright violation. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 00:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jackstarrzz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19930 was submitted on Dec 04, 2017 08:35:15. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:35, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon: - Are you able to say when these abuses of multiple accounts occurred? Or, even vaguely as in 'recently' vs 'a long time ago'? SQL ^{Query me!} 01:35, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@SQL: - This seems to me like a checkuser match for User:ZestyLemonz; I'm basing my match on the previous day's use of the same IP and similar access by the blocked-as-ZestyLemonz User:Iamgemmacollinsformertowiestar, as well as the use of a blocked-because-of-ZestyLemonz /64 range to make the most recent unblock request. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 03:26, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jackstarrzz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As you can see, my previous block requests state the reasons I should be unblocked. I’ve avoided block evasion and read through the Wikipedia fair use and copyright policy, as you can see my contributions were constructive, I was blocked for copyright violation. I requested an unblock on the UTRS, however they said as I have access to my talk page, they said I should get an administrator to review my unblock request.

Decline reason:

As above, advanced technical evidence ties you to abusing multiple accounts. Please either address this or make further requests from your primary account. SQL ^{Query me!} 05:56, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jackstarrzz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As you can see, my previous block requests state the reasons I should be unblocked. I’ve avoided block evasion and read through the Wikipedia fair use and copyright policy, as you can see my contributions were constructive, I was blocked for copyright violation. I requested an unblock on the UTRS, however they said as I have access to my talk page, they said I should get an administrator to review my unblock request. NOTE: The above declined block requests are incorrect, as my account was blocked for copyright violations NOT sockpuppetry, and as I’ve stated, I’ve read through the COPYRIGHT policy, and have made it clear that this behaviour will not occur again, therefore I should be unblocked

Decline reason:

Even though you were blocked for copyright violations, there is clear evidence that you have been editing via sockpuppets. Regardless of why the initial block was done, you've continued to violate Wikipedia's terms of use. If you wish to be unblocked at this point, do it from your primary account. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:56, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've changed this to a checkuser block. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 16:57, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@RickinBaltimore: This is my primary account. If you look through my contributions, you can clearly see I’ve made over 500 edits on this account, as it is my primary account, I’ve read through the policies and therefore I should be unblocked — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackstarrzz (talk • contribs) 04:51, December 8, 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Strictly Come Dancing It Takes Two titles.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Strictly Come Dancing It Takes Two titles.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:57, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Agnes Brown.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Agnes Brown.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jackstarrzz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked over two years ago for copyright violations and then on 7 December 2017 for creating a sock puppet account User:Jackstarrzz14 I’ve refrained from editing for nearly two years and I’ve read through the policies and guidelines. Therefore I believe I should be unblocked.

Decline reason:

Per below, you need to demonstrate understanding. What is copyright? Why does uploading images from the web harm Wikipedia? MER-C 17:59, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Administrator note We don't unblock people simply for reading the policies and guidelines. You need to demonstrate that you actually comprehend the various policies you violated. Yamla and Kuru both said this on 3 December 2017 above. This is critical, since much of your editing involved the very dicey world of image uploads, something I myself am not to keen on doing without great care. I'm also confused as to why you removed talk page comments in this edit. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:29, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jackstarrzz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’ve spent over two years reading the policies. I understand that you cannot upload images from the web due to copyright. And you cannot upload non free images if they are copyrighted to someone else.

Decline reason:

You have been repeatedly told that, "I read the policy" is not a sufficient demonstration that you understand copyright, and this is basically no better; your explanation here is less than cursory. Normally I would give you the standard set of copyright questions to assess your understanding, but it seems evident from your many previous appeals that you have no interest in explaining what - if anything - you understand about copyright on Wikipedia, and instead seem to think that you ought to be unblocked simply because it's been a while since the block was imposed. Since these repetitive and pointless appeals are becoming a pointless time-sink for administrators, I am revoking your talkpage access. When you have read the guide to appealing a block and are willing to take some time to explain what copyright is and how it works on Wikipedia, your avenue of appeal is UTRS. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:16, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You don't seem to be too interested in expending any effort to explain what you've learned in the last two years, like how to tell if something is copyrighted, or to answer direct questions that you've been asked. When a reviewing administrator has to determine whether or not a previously disruptive editor is competent enough to return to editing, it's very hard to make that determination from short, seemingly-bored responses. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:50, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Celebrity Big Brother 17 eye.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Celebrity Big Brother 17 eye.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Catherine Tate Nan.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Catherine Tate Nan.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]