User talk:Jadseanderson

Welcome

Hello, Jadseanderson, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Tijuana Brass^E@ 21:11, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Emma/Aelfgifu

Hi -- I noticed your edit to Image:Cnut and Emma Minster Register.jpg, so I went and checked the source I scanned it from. What it says is "King Cnut and Queen Emma (called by the English Aelfgyfu)". I am not an expert on Cnut, so I don't know if this has support elsewhere, but the source (James Campbell's "The Anglo-Saxons") is well respected. I'm going to go ahead and change it back, but I must admit I'm baffled. I also found this web page, which seems pretty authoritative as it's the British Library; it says effectively the reverse -- "King Cnut and Queen Aelfgifu (also called Emma)". If you know what's going on better than I do, please feel free to clarify again. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk) 03:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rough Stone Rolling

I noticed that you added a quote from Richard Bushman concerning his penchant for allowing Joseph Smith's stories. Where did you get this quote? Please cite it. Thanks! ukforever (talk) 20:30, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The citation was at the end of the reference, and I switched its position to clarify its origin. Salve atque vale.--John Foxe (talk) 00:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]