User talk:Jadu23
Speedy deletion nomination of Roma Arora[edit]
Hello Jadu23,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Roma Arora for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Anaxial (talk) 06:29, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
April 2018[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Roma Arora, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 18:36, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Philippines Urban Living Solutions (PULS) for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philippines Urban Living Solutions (PULS) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippines Urban Living Solutions (PULS) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella Velella Talk 08:21, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Shubham Soni concern[edit]
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Shubham Soni, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Shubham Soni[edit]
Hello, Jadu23. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shubham Soni".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:17, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Roma Arora for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roma Arora until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.