User talk:JagarTharnofTamriel
Welcome!
[edit]
|
David Pritchard article
[edit]Good job on David Pritchard (cricketer). Look forward to reading more of your articles. Cheers Roisterer (talk) 04:39, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South Brisbane District Cricket Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Marshal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:11, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Arthur Goldman (cricketer) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arthur Goldman (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Goldman (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Australian cricketers
[edit]Hi. Thanks again for your excellent work on expanding articles on Australian cricketers. If you have time and/or are interested, please could you take a look at the following pages. They have all been nominated for deletion, but was wondering if you had any extra info about any of them. Note this is not canvasing for the deletion discussions, but asking someone who has done excellent work in expanding these type of stubs.
Thank you. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:50, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Seconded. Well done, Jagar. No Great Shaker (talk) 12:05, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Always happy to fill out articles!, Unfortunately I only really use trove, and their archive of newspapers only goes up to 1953 for Queensland so is tricky to find anything on players after that period (although luckily Warden was a notable schoolboy cricketer so was some stuff on him). JagarTharnofTamriel (talk) 14:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
MOS
[edit]Hi there. I've noticed on several occasions, when expanding biographies, you refer to the subject by their given name. This practice contravenes the Manual of Style, which specifies that the surname should be used (see MOS:SURNAME for details). Regards. wjematherplease leave a message... 18:43, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for letting me know, will follow style in future! JagarTharnofTamriel (talk) 23:55, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Lance Druery for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lance Druery, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lance Druery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Stats tables on cricketer articles
[edit]Hi. I've noticed a couple of these and I think they are on the edge creating a problem - although I appreciate the work that goes into them.
There is a strong argument that they cause WP:NOTSTATS problems. We did make a decision at the cricket project a while back that we would avoid tables without context as well. You do see tables in articles at times, but they tend to try to summarise career bests and so on rather than add season by season detail. Sometimes these have context (Joe Denly for example), sometimes they don't. I'm just not sure that what you're doing is adding much actual value to what should be largely prose articles if it doesn't have some attempt to put it in context. I get what the stats do and what they can tell us, but I think we need to be careful about what we do in this regard.
The amount of detail is quite extensive and the table really quite wide - can you check what it looks like on a phone, for example. This is part of my problem. If they were reduced in detail and complexity (matches, runs, averages and wickets, maybe) then I would see less of a problem. Fwiw I also really dislike the colour heading row you've added - I'm a bit of an accessibility nerd and can see no advantage to using colour in that way.
I know the football project does something similar on lots of articles btw. Personally I think their tables are simpler - although still a bit too detailed for my taste - and I have concerns about the lack of context. But their stats are also simpler (games and goals iirc).
Do you think you could have a bit of a think about this and maybe try and a) come up with a slightly simpler format and b) add at least a paragraph of context about each one somehow? I'm not quite sure what the longer term solution is - it's an idea that we've talked about in the past I think but didn't come to any suitable conclusion. Blue Square Thing (talk) 08:10, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes makes sense, I am not sure either and it would be good to try and get some consensus before adding any more. My thinking is that the prose in the articles for Pritchard and Walsh provide the context as they essentially summarize their First-class careers from newspaper articles, but I felt that it is impossible to get a firm grip on their overall statistical output from stats buried in between quotes on technique and club cricket and things. In this sense I would only add tables to articles which have this career summary already (not to all articles, especially stubs as I feel this would fuel deletion argument considerably!). Will simplify down. Hope this 'tags' you: Blue Square Thing JagarTharnofTamriel (talk) 08:18, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Will remove colours for sure (chose header based on State team colours but on reflection agree this makes little sense, especially as players sometimes represented multiple states). JagarTharnofTamriel (talk) 08:20, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Also please see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cricket#Thoughts_on_statbox, hopefully can canvas more thoughts there JagarTharnofTamriel (talk) 08:25, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Just a little comment
[edit]Firstly, I will say thank you for expanding some of these Australian first-class articles that might not get much love in the cricket community with most of the focus being on the recent times. It's always good to try and expand some of the older articles (something that I am trying to do with these Australian tours).
Anyway I just want to put a small comment about the recent post here and that is remember to do the [[ ]] on articles you want to mention instead of the full link just to be a lot easier. Other than that, good job. HawkAussie (talk) 04:40, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 10
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Mackey (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
The article John de la Roche Bragge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
no evidence of notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 08:32, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Alan Reid
[edit]I downloaded your photo from File:Alan_Reid.png, displayed on the page Alan Reid (cricketer). adjusted the curves with Paint.net and uploaded back as a replacement file. I just used Adjustments => Curves... and used an "S" shaped curve saturated (maxed) for the first and last 25% or so. I used only two adjustment points. It seems to show more detail. You can see both versions on the commons page. If you don't like mine, feel free to let me know and I'll remove it or reload yours.
If you want to try Paint.net, you can find the download link on the Wiki page. Paint.net It's freeware and works on Windows only. You can get it from Microsoft for a few £s, and it will auto-update which I find convenient. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 20:36, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks heaps, it looks great. I've been using paint.net to mess around with the contrast settings to make newspaper clipping scans look a bit better but haven't used the more advanced features. Thanks for the tip! JagarTharnofTamriel (talk) 11:19, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- If you have the unprocessed original, you should be able to make it look better! Thanks for uploading those photos. Looks like a lot of work! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 11:21, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- You probably could use AI to make a real-looking color 3D image of them from these old halftones! Adakiko (talk) 11:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, JagarTharnofTamriel. Thank you for your work on Mick Dunn (boxer). User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
A really great historical article. It really needs more categories.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
scope_creepTalk 17:09, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Announcements from WikiProject Cricket
[edit]
| ||
Annual newsletter to be lauched[edit]WikiProject Cricket's annual newsletter titled The Stump Sapient is slated to be launched in December 2024. Following is a list of things that are to be included in the newsletter. Your contribution by editing the newsletter is appreciated.
Upcoming contests[edit]
Ongoing discussions[edit]
• Contribute to the newsletter • Subscribe to the newsletter • Join the WikiProject • Project discussions • Contests •
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Cricket Picture of the Year 2024 – Nominations open now!
[edit]
|
– MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)