User talk:JaggaBadaJasoos

May 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:40, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:40, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JaggaBadaJasoos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hey there, i came here to make wikipedia a good place and provide some information to wikipedia, but when i created some page , some other editor started spamming deletion request i have edited many pages and provided usefull information to this community, when they spammed it i deleted the template,then they threatened me in my talk page, after that when i cleared the deletion template several times a deletion panel was raised were people can vote that a article should be deleted or not, there also they came and started deleting possitive comments, and adding negative comments and when i undo it so that the votes should be honest, they managed to block me, Please Unblock me so that i can add my knowledge and make this community stronger, thanking you i hope you will see this matter wisely

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:58, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think an unblock can't even remotely be considered without also discussing the relationship between this account and User:Generator for Artist and User:The adarshsahu. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Takshshila Institute Of Engineering And Technology for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Takshshila Institute Of Engineering And Technology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takshshila Institute Of Engineering And Technology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:48, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adarsh Sahu[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Adarsh Sahu, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:57, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JaggaBadaJasoos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry for this, i understand i am the culprit of vandalism i hijacked a page , i totally understand this, this block is no longer nessasary because i know the crime that i have done, and this will never be repeated in future, i will never ever go against wikipedia guidelines, i will be thankful, please Unblock me JaggaBadaJasoos (talk) 14:43, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You haven't committed a crime. But to demonstrate your understanding, you will need to tell us what exactly you have done, and address any connection you might have to the accounts described above. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 19:00, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:40, 13 May 2021 (UTC). Hey there i really want to talk to you, please ping me at https://instagram.com/suhani_thakur2000 , lets have a one on one talk , or give me a place where i can talk to you , i think there is some miss understanding that i want to clear.[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JaggaBadaJasoos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have moved pages and continuesly edited my talk pages, and also i have again and again deleted the deletion template from the pages i created, i understand other editors put deletion template due to some valid reason, but i was not knowing that i will be blocked for that reason, on the other hand i dont have any connection with other accounts, this block is no longer nessesory since i will not repeat this mistakes again since i know the consiquences now, kindly unblock me, thanks takecare JaggaBadaJasoos (talk) 19:09, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So, to be clear, you thought it was perfectly okay to make an edit like this and then you discovered, no, there are consequences for doing so? And the only reason you won't act so terribly is because you are now aware there are consequences for your actions? Sorry, no, Wikipedia clearly isn't the place for you if this is your approach to honesty. Yamla (talk) 10:25, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

May 2021[edit]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:09, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]