User talk:Jai49/2019

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Jai49, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Swami Ramgovind Das, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

−

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Praxidicae (talk) 13:13, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Swami Ramgovind Das[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Swami Ramgovind Das, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 13:13, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ramgovind Das[edit]

>

Hello, Jai49, Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-) I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Ramgovind Das, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article. If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means. If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks! Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:32, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You tagged Segment (company)[edit]

Jai49 hello, please explain why you tagged Segment (company) with Template:Advert. Honestly, I do not see where it is written not from a neutral point of view or what content might be considered promotional. No external links at all, and references are all notable sources. I assume this template might have been added by you by mistake then I guess it should be removed to avoid confusion. Please review. Thank you. Avbgok (talk) 15:17, 7 December 2019 (UTC) Just to add: I have edited the article especially the language based on recommendations from some other editors (in particular, at the Teahouse). Should look even better now anyway, so thank you for pointing to a need to improve it. The 'Advert' tag looks as not needed (and other editor supported that it is unwarranted, in the teahouse). To sum up, that would be great if you could tell me what else needs correction from your point of view, or consider removing it if you agree now and joining the editing efforts wherever you feel needed. Thanks. Avbgok (talk) 21:38, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's better to keep the discussions about improving articles on the WP:Talk pages of the articles themselves. Good luck. Maybe some day, like me, you will have BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 22:00, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]