User talk:JamesHawks

Welcome!

Hello, JamesHawks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! EyeSerene^talk 08:20, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SPI[edit]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Paulioetc for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Wee Curry Monster talk 12:40, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Informational note: this is to let you know that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Regards, Wee Curry Monster talk 12:55, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What did i do anyways? did i do something about the 3 deaths of royal anglian regiment? I thought adding that due to the incorrect coordinates by a British FAC cause the flawed procurable are mostly to blame and it doesn't make sense if it doesn't put it there. JamesHawks (talk) 12:58, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Errant ^(chat!) 13:30, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for continuing the same activity as your other account, apparently in tandem. Please limit yourself to ONE account for such future editing. --Errant ^(chat!) 13:30, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

your other account? What other account? What did i do anyways? did i do something about the 3 deaths of royal anglian regiment? I thought adding that due to the incorrect coordinates by a British FAC cause the flawed procedures are mostly to blame and it doesn't make sense if that sentence doesn't put it there. So one person cannot go near that section or what? My old account got blocked for no reason(i forget what is it) so i created a new one.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JamesHawks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here JamesHawks (talk) 13:46, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not provided a rationale with your request. Please note that CheckUser has established that you are the same as Paulioetc (talk · contribs), so this account will remain blocked indefinitely. Any request for unblocking will have to come from the master account. Favonian (talk) 13:52, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.