User talk:JamieEdel

Welcome![edit]

Hello, JamieEdel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Jytdog (talk) 03:42, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting citations[edit]

Hi JamieEdel

Would you please review the stuff here about formatting citations? it is not good to use bare URLs (see WP:Bare URL) -- Jytdog (talk) 03:45, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I will do a deep review of the policies before future edits/additions and use of citations. JamieEdel (talk) 09:11, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest?[edit]

Hi JamieEdel - the content you have added about the Celgene settlement uses press releases from attorneys involved in the case, and features the names of the law firms that were involved - you have probably noticed by now that we do not usually do this.

I work on conflict of interest issues here in Wikipedia, along with my regular editing which is mostly about health and medicine. I'm giving you notice of our Conflict of Interest guideline and Terms of Use, and will have some comments and requests for you below.

Hello, JamieEdel. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.

Comments and requests[edit]

Wikipedia is a widely-used reference work and managing conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. As in academia, COI is managed here in two steps - disclosure and a form of peer review. Please note that there is no bar to being part of the Wikipedia community if you want to be involved in articles where you have a conflict of interest; there are just some things we ask you to do (and if you are paid, some things you need to do).

Disclosure is the most important, and first, step. While I am not asking you to disclose your identity (anonymity is strictly protecting by our WP:OUTING policy) would you please disclose if you have some connection with any of the law firms involved with the Celgene litigation - or any other party involved there - directly or through a third party (e.g. a PR agency or the like)? You can answer how ever you wish (giving personally identifying information or not), but if there is a connection, please disclose it. After you respond (and you can just reply below), I can walk you through how the "peer review" part happens and then, if you like, I can provide you with some more general orientation as to how this place works. Please reply here, just below, to keep the discussion in one place. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 04:02, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:List of largest civil only pharmaceutical settlements has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of largest civil only pharmaceutical settlements. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 16:42, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of largest civil only pharmaceutical settlements has been accepted[edit]

List of largest civil only pharmaceutical settlements, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 00:37, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]