User talk:Jampt07

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Jampt07, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 05:49, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:22, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jampt07 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand why I'm like this, but I think my edits are correct

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts, but do not address this in your unblock request. In your next unblock request, you should address this reason. PhilKnight (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jampt07 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Maybe I have the same IP, but the problem here is that my edits are not wrong but have been pushed back, which is absurd, making Wikipedia no longer an ideal place for people like me to contribute actively.

Decline reason:

You are not blocked for your edits (which are not relevant) but for violating WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 12:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jampt07 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I used to use multiple accounts but never used it for illegal purposes (Wikipedia doesn't ban this), unless I probably have the same IP as the puppets, I hope to be able to get unblocked to contribute positively for Wikipedia, this kind of ban is dogmatic and negative for Wikikpedia.

Decline reason:

See below. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Sir Sputnik: What are other accounts used by this editor? Vanjagenije (talk) 20:16, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanjagenije: This is Phạm Văn Rạng aka Japanese555. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, @Jampt07: You should make the unblock request from you original account (User:Phạm Văn Rạng). Vanjagenije (talk) 20:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to say much, please be careful in preserving Wikipedia, otherwise you will be responsible for it, the important thing is that I don't regret making an active and impartial contribution to Wikipedia, not self-interest and shady things. Bye. Jampt07 (talk) 01:19, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Phạm Văn Rạng per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Phạm Văn Rạng. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~TNT (she/her • talk) 20:05, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]