User talk:Jasmine059

Welcome!

Hello, Jasmine059, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as CTA's most used rail (L') stations, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pichpich (talk) 22:03, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of CTA's most used rail (L') stations

The article CTA's most used rail (L') stations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content is not encyclopedic. Wikipedia is not a how-to guide.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pichpich (talk) 22:03, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Whosays.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Whosays.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Whosaysalt.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Whosaysalt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:54, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Whosays.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Whosays.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:54, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Loveyoulikeselenagomez.jpg

The file File:Loveyoulikeselenagomez.jpg does not have valid source information, URL given in source is a dead link, please provide valid information on where this image came from. Rehevkor ✉ 22:15, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Loveyoulikeselenagomez.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Loveyoulikeselenagomez.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:58, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Loveyoulikeselenagomez.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Loveyoulikeselenagomez.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:07, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Eagles 24/7 (C) 04:00, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking reason

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jasmine059 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Jerome0012 and Shakira126 is related to me, so why did I get block from looking at my family members page? I have no idea about what's going on because its not right to just acuse someone of being a sockpuppeted account and just block it. I just wanted to see how my brother and my cousin's account looked because they wanted me to log in their account to check for any messages or etc. This is really confusing and I just want my account back because you guys are just acusing someone of being sockpuppeted. I'm calm and happy but why did I get blocked for logging on to my family members Wikipedia talk? Was I not supposed to do that?

Decline reason:

your statement is obviously untrue based on the contributions from this account, and if it is true it means that this account has been compromised, which is also grounds for blocking. Nick-D (talk) 05:35, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

See WP:BROTHER for why this excuse does not work. Note to reviewing admin: Jasmine059 has been

Confirmed as a sockpuppet of User:Jerome0012 by a CU. Eagles 24/7 (C) 04:39, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Loveyoulikeselenagomez.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Loveyoulikeselenagomez.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:32, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]