User talk:Jason f90

Hey Jason, I just wanna send kudos your way for your work on the Puddle of Mudd page. It's great that we have a larger article now. I gotta ask though, where did you get all of your information? Is it from interviews, or on a DVD or something? The problem with making the article larger now is that it is open to more scutiny, and I'm sure it's not going to be long before some pain-in-the-ass admin or bot is gonna come along a stick an ugly "This article is lacking sources" tag on it. So please, if you can cite your sources, you would make the article even better. Again, good job! -- Reaper X 16:00, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
P.S.: You seem to have alot of interest in rock music and it's sub-genres. I highly recommend you check out the Rock music WikiProject, and perhaps become a participant.

Papa Roach

Hey there. Sorry to hear the article's still having trouble. Your best bet would be to go to WP:RFPP and ask for semi-protection of the article to avoid the anon's repeated changes. It's not perfect, but if the anons are rotating through a number of IPs, it's difficult to bust them as a vandal or anything else. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:00, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:IBAW.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IBAW.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pomb.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pomb.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 10:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Throughglassstonesour.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Throughglassstonesour.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Livefromtoronto.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Livefromtoronto.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)