User talk:Jayanta kishore Paul

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Jayanta kishore Paul, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GILO A&E⇑ 21:45, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of LA Times Magazine[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on LA Times Magazine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GILO A&E⇑ 21:45, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The power player magazine[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The power player magazine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GILO A&E⇑ 21:46, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. GILO A&E⇑ 21:48, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of New Asian Cuisine[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on New Asian Cuisine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GILO A&E⇑ 21:49, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:53, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback[edit]

Hi Jayanta kishore Paul,
You seem to have edited your user page, with an autobiography. I am not sure what you mean by "my main page".
Did you mean to create a new page in article space? If so You should take a look at Wikipedia:Auto-biography.

220 of ^Borg 09:11, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jayanta Kishore Paul[edit]

Hi, thanks for message. Lots of problems. I deleted your article because

You need to provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that he meets the notability guidelines. (organizations and companies) (music) It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, or they will be deleted. Although you gave a list of references, because they were not formatted as in-line citations, it was very difficult to see what facts each was supporting. It was also clear that most, if not all were self-editable or web-only sources of dubious independence or reliability.
It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: is a professional celebrity Chef... he has achieved new heights in traditional Indian cooking... A culinary expert... highly motivated chef he has received only positive responses for his culinary expertise from people... at a top restaurant... he excelled to achieve the best marks in class... working 16 to 18 hours a day... successfully open one of the finest French restaurants... working 360 days straight without vacations... catered to many socialites and celebrities... His extraordinary talent is widely recognized — much more in the same vein, this is an encyclopaedia, not a chance for self promotion.
a new Cook Book with the most exquisite traditional Indian Cooking. Paul decided to write this book to remind people of the rich traditional Indian food, as people today have forgotten about the delectable Indian dishes and are more inclined towards American fast food, Chinese, Italian or other international cuisines. Paul's each and every recipe is being very carefully selected and being personally written. Every recipe is being created, tried and tasted by himself . Paul's book will not let you forget the magic of traditional Indian cooking and it's rich heritage. He plans to successfully translate his culinary genius into his book in the coming — Pure spam, spam, spam. This is an encyclopaedia, not free advertising for the book.
Judging by your username, you have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that you are notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.
You may or may not be notable enough for a Wikipedia biography, but what you have actually written is a vanity page with a completely over-the-top plug for the book. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]