User talk:Jaywu2000

Cantonese

https://www.ethnologue.com/language/yue, NOW this should be a reliable source. says total speakers around 75 Million.

I gotta say though, you guys are a bunch of Cantonese haters. 75 Million is already too low and not correct but I found Ethnologue, which is completely legit and reliable and it says 75 Million. In all honesty, it should be around 150 million. There are over 80 million permanent residents in Guangdong province, about 40% of the 50 Million in Guanxi province speak Cantonese, then you got 7.5 million in HK, 600,000 in Macau and all the overseas Chinese. But whatever, I provided a real and reliable source and it says 75 Million so I'm going to go with that, it's still higher than 68. You clowns probably work for the CCP or just hating Cantonese and riding that Mandarin dong. It's still an official language in HK and Macau so you Mandarin lovers ain't gonna kill it just yet. You can block me all you want, I'm just going to keep coming. Oh yeah I speak Mandarin too BTW being from Taiwan and as you can tell my English it quite amazing, I can sling it and slang it all day, dui bu dui? I already spoke with UCLA and USC professors on this matter so I'm going to come quick with an even more reliable source with a number over 100 million where it should be but you monkeys won't let Cantonese be and you gotta clown around. But I'll play by your dumb rules for now. okay Zaijian!

lease stop adding unreferenced figures to the Cantonese article. I've opened a discussion of the issue at Talk:Cantonese#Number of speakers, where yo may wish to give your views. Kanguole 19:40, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't just change figures that have attached references. If you have new sources (for number of speakers rather than population), please add them. Kanguole 07:52, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The 68 million figure is followed by a citation of a source, which contains that figure. When you change it to 150 million, you are misrepresenting what the source says. Please don't do that. Kanguole 08:02, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to add a different figure, you need a reliable source for it. Please don't change the figure that has an attached source, because that misrepresents that source. Kanguole 22:45, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have raised this issue at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Reference falsification at Cantonese. Kanguole 08:49, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have explained at Talk:Cantonese#Number of speakers why the source mentioned in your edit summaries is not reliable. Please engage there instead of continually reverting. You should also be aware of the three-revert rule, which you have already broken. Kanguole 15:11, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly advice from fellow Cantonese speaker

Jaywu2000, as a fellow Cantonese speaker, and editor, I advise that you stop edit warring on the article. Every time you change the article you are altering a statement that is supported by a source. This is misrepresentation of the source as well as Original research. Both of these are violations of Wikipedia policy and you will be blocked if you continue down this road. If you want to change the figures, you need to come up with a reliable source that backs up your statement and you absolutely need to start discussing with other editors who are disputing your edits, per WP:BRD. --Blackmane (talk) 01:55, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information. Toa Nidhiki05 08:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of languages by total number of speakers. Love —LiliCharlie (talk) 02:53, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Reference falsification at Cantonese. Jayjg ^(talk) 15:31, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have restarted the discussion on these edits at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Cantonese again. Kanguole 22:14, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cantonese

Given that all of your previous edits have been reverted from basically any article you've touched, I would highly advise that you start a talk page discussion on anything you want to add. In the case of your edit to Cantonese I have started a discussion on the talk page and pinged Kanguole and Lilicharlie. I haven't reverted your edit as I want to have some discussion about it first. Please join the discussion on the talk page. Blackmane (talk) 01:07, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Protection of the Varieties of Chinese

Hello- I would like to invite your comments and edits on a new page, Protection of the Varieties of Chinese, which is based on a Chinese Wikipedia article. Geographyinitiative (talk) 10:20, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw that you deleted two persons from the list of 'Notable non-native speakers of Chinese' ([1]). Both of these people have some level of knowledge of Mandarin Chinese. What was your reasoning here? Geographyinitiative (talk) 04:57, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to restore the content that was deleted from the Chinese as a foreign language page. If there are any objections, let me know. Geographyinitiative (talk) 08:35, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cantonese. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. thanks for being apart of my 3000th edit!!! :D CrispyCream27 ^(Talk) 04:47, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Continued disruption at Cantonese, again, again. --Blackmane (talk) 14:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jayjg ^(talk) 15:09, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Another ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Matthew hk (talk) 07:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 07:05, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]