User talk:Je6aDr8D

ip block[edit]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Je6aDr8D (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

68.79.93.72 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Block evasion

Blocking administrator: MuZemike (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Now blocked directly as a WP:SOCK (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:41, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Je6aDr8D (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I recently created an account. However, I saw that there was an autoblock on my ip.I followed the directions, and then requested for the autoblock to be reviewed. It was declined, but then I was called a sock of User: Treemanshoe, and it was stated that ot was because of a duck test. I lloked it up, and it said I had similarities to the sock user. However, I haven't even edited yet, so I don't see how this can be.--Je6aDr8D (talk) 20:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Username follows same unusual capitalization pattern as banned user. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:29, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Requesting blocking admin's comment: Which edits by this user make you suspect sockpuppetry? I can't see any. Sandstein 20:09, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation by e-mail. It's plausible, but not compelling; therefore I'm leaving this open for others to review. Sandstein 20:21, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone else can e-mail me (or now Sandstein) for the non-WP:BEANS reasoning behind my decision to full block the account as a sock. Of course, a careful look at the block log might be a hint too. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:27, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Je6aDr8D (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I use this same username for other things I log in for. It has no relation to a sock. And plus there name has all letters, mine has some numbers. There's, everyother letter is capitalized. Mine goe capital, small, small, capital, small, capital. As I am sure other users have names similar to mine, so I still don't see any evidence that says I'm a sock. Please at least give me a chance to edit, then you'll see I'm a new user.--Je6aDr8D (talk) 21:02, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed by CheckUser as a sock puppet of User:TrEeMaNsHoE. You're not fooling us. –MuZemike 21:10, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Je6aDr8D (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can I please have someone with an unbiased point of view. I still don't see why I was blocked, my username has nothing to do with that other one. I haven't even edited yet. Could you at least give me a chance?--Je6aDr8D (talk) 21:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirms the identity which you deny. The only way you are going to get unblocked is to e-mail directly to MuZemike --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:16, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.