User talk:JeanClaudeN1

Welcome!

Hi JeanClaudeN1! I noticed your contributions to Michael Ballack and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Mattythewhite (talk) 23:07, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm Trilletrollet. I noticed that you recently removed content from Schleswig-Holstein without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 21:11, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mass changes to "federal states" of Germany

Hi JeanClaudeN1, thanks for your recent contributions. I noticed one thing though, that you have been removing the phrase "federal states" from numerous Germany-related articles. I reverted your changes to the Berlin article, and may do the same for others. The German word Bundesländer is most commonly translated as "federal states", see Linguee's entries for Bundesländer and Bundesland, as well as dict.cc, Langenscheidt, Cambridge Dictionary, and others.

You're welcome to use whatever alternative valid translation you like in your own writing, such as "German states", or just "state". However, I would strongly caution you against going on a mission to change existing usage in a large number of articles. Making changes to optional styles on a mass scale, without prior consensus, is generally disapproved of, please see MOS:STYLEVAR. Thanks for your understanding. --IamNotU (talk) 11:50, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jean Claude, I notice you're still doing this. Please be aware that mass changes without consensus may constitute WP:DISRUPTIVE EDITING. Please stop or seek consensus, for example, at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Germany. Bermicourt (talk) 17:52, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bermicourt, using the term "federal state" for federated states is not consistent with the articles Federal state and federated state. A federal state is a federation. See for example Communities, regions and language areas of Belgium: "Belgium is a federal state ..." and States of Germany: "The Federal Republic of Germany, as a federal state, consists of sixteen partly sovereign federated states ..." JeanClaudeN1 (talk) 18:14, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that appears to be a problem with those articles. Langenscheidt's flagship Muret-Sanders dictionary translates Bundesland as "(federal) state" which agrees with IamNotU's findings in various leading dictionaries. Bermicourt (talk) 18:58, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, "federal state" is first of all only a word by word translation of the term "Bundesstaat" or "Bundesland", that's correct and every dictionary will confirm this. However, the official term in German is Land, while "Bundesland" is only used informally. The term "Bundesstaat /-land" is used ambiguously in German, unlike in other languages. See for example Bundesstaat and US-Bundesstaat. In English, however, a "Gliedstaat" is universally referred to as "federated state", "constituent state" or simply "state", while a Bundesstaat is referred to as "federation" or "federal state". Here is another example: Federal State of Austria. JeanClaudeN1 (talk) 20:24, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am of course aware that the term "Land" is often mistranslated to "federal state" in German sources. But that does not make it any more correct. In Britannica the terms "constituent state" and "state" are used btw. JeanClaudeN1 (talk) 20:41, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not just every dictionary. Just look at the ngram viewer stats for German states and you'll see that English sources commonly use "federal state of..." but never "federated state of...". I've given an example on the talk page of the relevant article. Bermicourt (talk) 21:31, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on the talk page and reverted the edit. Please don't edit war and wait and see if other users (native English speakers) share your point of view. Thank you. JeanClaudeN1 (talk) 22:59, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Prussia

Stop removing my changes, read the book before making references to it. Royal Prussia wasn't an autonomous province if the autonomy was abandoned completely in 1569. Delegates from Royal Prussia were taking part in Sejms way before 1569. If you will continue your action I will consider them vandalism. Marcelus (talk) 03:19, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its magnates could participate in the election of its titular monarch, the Polish King - it wasn't a titular monarch, that's a serious agenda pushing
Royal Prussia did not participate in the Sejm, the Polish parliament - that's incorrect. Sejm in years 1493-1505, Prussian delegates participated in it occasionally since the beginning (most notably in years 1529-30), since 1563 continuously until the end of PLC existence Marcelus (talk) 03:43, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for using the talk page to solve the issue.

First, please check the definition of vandalism.

Second, the above information has been on Wikipedia for a long time and was not added by me. The information itself is not even important to me. I reverted because you deleted it without giving a source yourself. So can you please cite a source that supports your statements (regarding the period before 1563)?

Third, you again deleted a source without explanation. Please stop doing that.

I have again reverted those changes which in my view are not an improvement and restored the deleted citation. Apart from that, the current version is fine with me (if you give a source). I will continue to revert unconstructive edits in the future. Please stop edit-warring now, thank you. JeanClaudeN1 (talk) 02:18, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why you reverted my change? That version is better because it mentions that land of Teutonic Order were divided, one part was a Polish fief, one was incorporated to the kingdom. Nothing factually wrong about that plus it adds more information. That's an improvement of the article Marcelus (talk) 11:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sorbs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assimilation. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

GizzyCatBella🍁 19:47, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cologne montage

Hello, if you change the montage back again, the previous long-standing montage that you deleted a few days ago would have to be reinstated, and a discussion about which montage is nicer would have to take place Tibesti1 (talk) 19:15, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FlixBus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Road toll.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source

Do you mind telling me where did you get this from please? GizzyCatBella🍁 00:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC) 👉 [1] - Quote - Samuel Hartlib (c.1599-1670) was born in Elbing in Prussia c.1600 the son of George Hartlib, a Pole, and Elizabeth Langthon. His maternal grandfather John Langthon was a wealthy English merchant.. - GizzyCatBella🍁 00:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection requested

I requested WW2 reparations page be protected. Please don’t make any reverts until the talk page agreement is achieved. The identical message has been left on your opponent's talk page. - GizzyCatBella🍁 14:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard

Please note that I have set up a section related to the Talk:World War II reparations dispute regarding the two sentances on the 1970 treaty talks and the 2004 declaration by the Council of Ministers on the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard. E-960 (talk) 16:20, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]