User talk:Jeatloh

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~~~~

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jeatloh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here Jeatloh (talk) 04:13, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline, no reason given. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 06:38, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Editing tests[edit]

Hi there, looking at some of your edits, I notice that many of them appear to be edit tests. If you want to experiment, you should do so in your sandbox not in live articles. Persistent editing tests, even if you undo your changes, can become disruptive over time. Note also that you shouldn't be marking your edits as minor when they are not minor. A minor edit is one that could not possibly be the subject of a dispute. That would be typo fixes, grammar fixes, punctuation changes, reverting clear vandalism, etc. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:14, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Jeatloh (talk) 23:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing[edit]

Since you and RHaworth have presumably had no editing interactions, I can't quite understand why you've left four pointless posts on their talk page, and it is bordering on harassment. If you're not here to contribute to the encyclopedia, you may quickly find your editing privileges interrupted. So please, either contribute constructively, or find another hobby. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:23, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Jeatloh[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as User talk:Jeatloh, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (delete wikipedia acount) --Jeatloh (talk) 04:18, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 06:41, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For your little stunt at template manipulation to show that your unblock had been accepted, I am revoking your ability to edit this page. Use UTRS if you want to appeal. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 06:41, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]