User talk:Jedd Raynier Eata

December 2010

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nishi-Shinjuku Station, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 01:32, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Please do not use talk pages such as Tokyo Metro 7000 series for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 05:14, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Shibuya Station, you may be blocked from editing. --DAJF (talk) 06:57, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Toei 12-000 series edits

Hi. I see you re-added the "Stub" template and "Tokyo Metro trainsets" to the Toei 12-000 series article, but if you take the time to read WP:STUB, you will see that this article is not a stub article. Also, as the 12-000 series is operated by Tokyo Metropolitan Bureau of Transportation (Toei) it is not a Tokyo Metro trainset. I am a bit concerned by many of your recent edits to Tokyo Subway related articles, as you do not appear to understand what you are editing. Please also be sure to include an edit summary so that other editors do not mistake your edits for vandalism. --DAJF (talk) 06:54, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Unexplained deletion of material

Erm, could you please explain why you deleted a valid image from the Tokyo Metro 7000 series article in this edit here? You didn't take the time to include an edit summary despite having been asked to before, so it's difficult to tell whether you just don't know what you are doing or whether you are intentionally removing valid material, which is vandalism. If you keep doing this, I'm afraid I will have to report you for vandalism, as 99% of your edits so far have been unconstructive and just create work for other editors who have to clean up the mess after you. --DAJF (talk) 12:25, 29 December 2010 (UTC)