User talk:Jeffrey Scott Maxwell/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Your submission at Articles for creation
Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Corporación José R. Lindley S.A.. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. ➜GƒoleyFour (GSV) 04:15, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Welcome
|
Your submission at Articles for creation
Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Corporación José R. Lindley S.A.. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 07:21, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Winter's (chocolate)
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on Winter's (chocolate), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Winter's (chocolate) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bped1985 (talk) 04:03, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
Corporación José R. Lindley S.A., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
- The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
- Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Sven Manguard Wha? 20:59, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 01:18, 24 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Nomination of Premium (marketing) for deletion
The article Premium (marketing) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premium (marketing) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Empire3131 (talk) 03:15, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
The article List of hobbies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- subjective impossible to maintain, unencyclopedic list
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 02:41, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of List of hobbies
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on List of hobbies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. RadioFan (talk) 02:42, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
About the different deletion processes and List of hobbies
Based on your comments at List of hobbies, I think that you are confused about the different deletion processes used on Wikipedia. Articles can be deleted by several different processes, including Speedy Deletion, Proposed Deletion, and Articles for Deletion. User:RadioFan initially tagged List of hobbies for speedy deletion, but User:Nyttend declined the speedy deletion because the article was substantially different than the previous version. As such, the article is no longer tagged for speedy deletion. After the speedy deletion was declined, User:RadioFan tagged the article for deletion under the proposed deletion process. Proposed deletion is only used when no one objects to deleting the article. Anyone is free to remove a proposed deletion tag, so you could just remove it. I'm going to remove the tag now because it is obvious that you disagree with the proposed deletion, and also because articles that were previously discussed at Articles for Deletion are not eligible for the proposed deletion process (even if they were previously deleted). User:RadioFan may still think the article should be deleted, in which case he is likely to start a new discussion at Articles for Deletion. If he does start a new discussion there, you can post to the discussion why you think the article should be kept. If he does start a discussion at Articles for Deletion about the article, there will be a link to the discussion at the top of the article (if you haven't added the article to your watch list, you should probably do so). I hope that clarifies the situation. Calathan (talk) 01:10, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks Calathan. I appreciate your comments and information. You have been very helpful. This is all quite a learning process, but in time I will get this figured out. Part of my confusion stems from a different page that I created that an administrator had deleted with no warning, no duscussion, no nothing. Since RadioFan seems passionate about this deletion, it looks like I will get a chance to argue my case now. Best Regards, Jeffrey Scott Maxwell (talk) 18:13, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of List of hobbies for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of hobbies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of hobbies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. RadioFan (talk) 17:55, 31 March 2011 (UTC)