User talk:Jenhawk777/History of Christ myth

User 74.138.111.159

Thank you for your contribution! It's amazing! You must have been the one to write this section originally and therefore did not feel the need for consensus to share it--clever and effective--up to a point--that point being that this article will create a redundancy and will automatically be rejected for publication unless you can make some progress toward getting them to agree to truncate their history section and refer history here. This would also need the twentieth and twenty-first century section as well.

I personally have made no progress in gaining cooperation for any changes that don't reflect their personal views.

I offered: "I'll tell you what. I will copy what I think needs additions, I will make changes that are representative of alternate views, and I will do it all in my sandbox only. When it's together, I will contact you here and you both can access my sandbox, read the changes, request changes to the changes, criticize, have input -- all before I put anything into the article. Jonathon didn't like Stout so I got rid of him; I am responsive to the concerns of others. I will go so far as to promise nothing will happen on this article unless and until we have consensus. If you will agree the article could in fact use some balancing, there is no reason why we can't do that in a way that satisfies everyone. I will even do my best to keep it concise--(though in all fairness, this article is anything but concise). How does that sound? It will require you accept the inclusion of things you disagree with. Can you?"

Apparently the answer was no. If you don't have better luck, dispute resolution may be in our future. And I hate running to teacher. It's just dumb not to be able to resolve things as adults ourselves. Jenhawk777 (talk) 05:27, 29 March 2018 (UTC)