User talk:JensEriksson

August 2007[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Stockholm on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tucker001 20:24, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I didn't even think that was going to work! This is neat!JensEriksson 20:28, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

It's blatantly obvious you're a sockpuppet. You expected that we believed you changed your ways, and then you made another badhand account.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In what way is this account "bad hand"? Every contribution I did under it helped improve the articles in question!JensEriksson 05:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JensEriksson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

But Santin, that's exactly what I tired to do with my KensingtonBlonde account, and look what happened. no one will let me demonstrate productivity. Everytime I try, someone blocks me. I didn't do anything wrong in the context of that account, what do i do?

Decline reason:

Leave Wikipedia. If we cannot trust you to adhere to our policies and guidelines (as this account clearly shows), we cannot allow you to edit. — Yamla 04:51, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JensEriksson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

For how long?

Decline reason:

As a sockpuppet and sockpuppeteer, you are no longer welcome here at Wikipedia...indefinitely banned. — Jmlk 1 7 05:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JensEriksson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't see why something can't be worked out. And you can't have some de facto ban. No formal banning ever took place. With all due respect, you are not ArbCom.

Decline reason:

There is nothing to work out. You are a sockpuppet, and a disruptive one at that. We cannot trust you, even after chances, and you have chosen time and time again to not adhere to Wikipedia policy. — Jmlk 1 7 05:39, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.