User talk:Jeremy rutman

This is Jeremy rutman's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nanox imaging (September 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AviationFreak was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nanox imaging and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nanox imaging, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AviationFreak💬 21:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeremy rutman! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AviationFreak💬 21:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nanox imaging (September 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AviationFreak were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS and Wikipedia:ONEEVENT for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Submission reads like a news report - Citing stock prices, listing patents, and commentating on analysis reports should not be the bulk of an article. WP:PEACOCK is also present.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nanox imaging and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nanox imaging, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AviationFreak💬 18:15, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello Jeremy rutman. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jeremy rutman. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jeremy rutman|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. AviationFreak💬 18:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy rutman (talk) 19:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC) Hello AviationFreak. I'm not sure this is the right technique to answer your message but I shall solider on in the hopes it is. I'm an independent patent attorney, working neither for nanox nor citron - and I'm rather mystified why you would have arrived at this conclusion since I present both sides of a rather murky affair , in a nonjudgemental and quite impartial way - indeed a 'neutral point of view'. If it is clear to you that I'm partisan, I would ask what side exactly do you believe I am taking?[reply]

If you have looked at my edited page you will see I do 'refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed' - I have referenced both nanox itself, citron and muddywaters, a source attempted to debunk citron, as well as 'objective fact' type sources as the patent office, stock prices and the like. Finally, the subject is I blv. rather inarguably 'worthy of inclusion' even if one were to only judge by the dollar amounts involved and not take into account the rather massive journalistic interest . Jeremy rutman (talk) 19:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good - Your article was written in a way that is typical of many Undisclosed Paid Editors (full company names, patent information, etc.), but your work and experience as a patent attorney makes that understandable. I appreciate that you showed both sides of the controversy surrounding the company, abiding by the WP:NPOV guidelines. As far as responding to talk page discussions, what you did was good - Just as a note, it's customary to place one or more colons in front of your message to indent it. The most recent review I left on the page still applies, though if and when the draft is resubmitted for review I will not review it. I personally feel that I am a bit too involved in this discussion to review the draft further, but we have a a lot of other reviewers who can approve it. Keep in mind, however, that we currently have a significant backlog and it may take a while before a reviewer has a chance to look at your draft. All the best! AviationFreak💬 20:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Patent. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 13:11, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nanox imaging (January 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Previous concerns have not been addressed. "Submission reads like a news report - Citing stock prices, listing patents, and commentating on analysis reports should not be the bulk of an article. WP:PEACOCK is also present"

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nanox imaging and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nanox imaging, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 19:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nanox imaging[edit]

Hello, Jeremy rutman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nanox imaging, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nanox imaging[edit]

Hello, Jeremy rutman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nanox imaging".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:47, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nano-X Imaging moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Nano-X Imaging, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 23:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nano-X Imaging (January 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hatchens were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nano-X Imaging and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nano-X Imaging, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 08:05, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nano-X Imaging[edit]

Hello, Jeremy rutman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nano-X Imaging, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nano-X Imaging[edit]

Hello, Jeremy rutman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nano-X Imaging".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:22, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Belbury. I noticed that you recently removed content from Non-fungible token without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Belbury (talk) 11:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your reversion was a mistake which makes the energy usage section for the NFT page once again out-of-date and incorrect. Jeremy rutman (talk) 12:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeremy. You need to add a reliable source to confirm that a "merge" has happened and that NFTs "no longer require the high energy usage, and consequent greenhouse gas emissions", neither of the sources you left in the article were saying that. Wikipedia articles should source all statements, particularly major ones like that.

It would also be good to keep and rewrite the earlier energy concerns for context, if such a merge has happened, rather than just deleting those paragraphs. --Belbury (talk) 12:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You will find upon close inspection that refs to the merge, proof-of-work, and proof-of-stage definitions are already in my revision, and these being references to wikipedia articles, one imagines they may be considered a reliable source by wikipedia. If you read the referred-to articles you will discover that a. the merge has indeed occurred, and b. it renders the entire discussion of exorbitant energy use in proof-of-work systems moot. Jeremy rutman (talk) 12:50, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You might think so, but no, Wikipedia articles aren't actually considered reliable sources for other Wikipedia articles. You can and should just copy across the sources that the other articles are using. (Note that ultcoin365.com doesn't seem to be a reliable source, someone else just deleted it from the NFT article.) --Belbury (talk) 13:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Jeremy rutman. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Geek Code, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. It's inappropriate to write up a GitHub project that you're involved with, presenting it as the sole unofficial revival of the original 1990s code. Belbury (talk) 16:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that I'm associated with a given project actually makes me uniquely positioned to inform the wiki on it...so at this point I give up. Several of my hours have been wasted trying to update the woefully out-of-date entries on several topics, but Wikipedia is , thanks to your efforts and I imagine that of many others, protected against any improvement ! Jeremy rutman (talk) 18:11, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't notice you already had a COI warning back in 2020, as well as a request not to add your own websites as links to articles. Yes, it does look like your aims aren't really compatible with Wikipedia, then, and that other editors have had to deal with you not understanding this. --Belbury (talk) 19:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My own websites in that case is the best reference on the web that could (and still can) be found. The fact that I happened to be an expert on the matter is not a conflict but a conflation. It is unfortunate that wikipedia at this point is prevented from being more complete and up-to-date by gatekeepers that would rather ban improvements than help to make such improvements happen. Jeremy rutman (talk) 19:07, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nano-X Imaging[edit]

Hello, Jeremy rutman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nano-X Imaging".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:22, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]