User talk:Jeromi Mikhael/Archives/2020/January

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Deputy Ministers of Religious Affairs (Indonesia) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Deputy Ministers of Religious Affairs (Indonesia) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 04:45, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 3rd Congress of the Indonesian Democratic Party you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Minecrafter0271 -- Minecrafter0271 (talk) 22:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

when creating articles[edit]

it is always a really good idea to have a category on the main page and project tag on the talk page !!! thanks JarrahTree 23:33, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

3rd Congress of the Indonesian Democratic Party[edit]

Information icon Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page 3rd Congress of the Indonesian Democratic Party to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Kingsif (talk) 22:25, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that I think some of the 'corrections' made by the first GA reviewer actually made the grammar and style worse. Kingsif (talk) 22:34, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article 3rd Congress of the Indonesian Democratic Party you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:3rd Congress of the Indonesian Democratic Party for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 22:41, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of 3rd Congress of the Indonesian Democratic Party[edit]

Hello! Your submission of 3rd Congress of the Indonesian Democratic Party at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 07:46, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article 3rd Congress of the Indonesian Democratic Party you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:3rd Congress of the Indonesian Democratic Party for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Minecrafter0271 -- Minecrafter0271 (talk) 23:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jeromi Mikhael, the GA review turns out to have been problematic: this was a brand new reviewer (and Wikipedia editor) who missed some significant issues with the article, so the "pass" has been reversed for now. I'm very sorry this has happened; I will do my best to get an experienced reviewer for you, and I hope they will note these issues so you can work on them and make the article better. Best of luck going forward. As for your DYK nomination, it will either be put on hold, or will be closed; in the latter case, you can renominate once the article passes its new review. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:17, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@BlueMoonset: Why don't you, yourself, review the article?--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 15:43, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Jeromi Mikhael, I didn't review the article myself because I was busy with other things, and because I wanted the article to get a prompt look. I also had a great deal of trouble understanding the article from the prose as it was written, and thought it best that someone else give it a try; as you can see, the new reviewer also had major difficulties with the prose, sufficiently that they immediately failed the nomination. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:52, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]