User talk:Jesaispas123445

March 2021

Hello, I'm M.Bitton. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Stade Abdelkader Khalef have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 16:34, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, There is a lot of contradiction about naming [1],[2],[3] ans i think it's better to rename it by New stadium of Tizi Ouzou until they find a consensus.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Krim Belkacem; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 17:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All sources are from french wikipedia so why remove some informations Jesaispas123445 (talk) 17:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. You have already been warned about WP:3RR and evading your block is doing you no good in either case. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:35, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why ? I added sources and proof, just reading it Jesaispas123445 (talk) 00:39, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Jesaispas123445 reported by User:M.Bitton (Result: ). Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 17:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Drmies (talk) 00:56, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jesaispas123445 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, Can I am unblocked, there is a lot of errors or a lack of sources that I try to correct but i'm blocked because of it. [4], irrelevant source [5] Krim is not mentionned, source i try to add [6]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 01:50, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jesaispas123445 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, Can i am unblocked please, my attitude was inapropriate that's why i am blocked and i have understood process (adding relevant sources, using talk page to validate some sentences or not, finding a consensus) and i think my contributions will be very useful especially on algerian War (1954-62) and on amazigh people

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:39, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jesaispas123445 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, Can i am unblocked, I'm blocked for sockpuppet, I always try to add sources or/and reasons for all contributions to prevent a disrupt but now i have understood process that using talk page is better and more interesting to find a consensus, I think my contributions will be useful because I will bring some informations about North African native with sources (mainly in french) and it's very important for me, there is a lack of knowledge in english wikipedia as regards North African culture.

Decline reason:

You are correct that you are blocked for sockpuppetry. Yet you do not address the reasons for this, nor convince us that you will not continue with this behaviour in future. Therefore I am declining this request. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 14:51, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jesaispas123445 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, There is a lack of knowledge about berber culture and thus my attitude became inapropriate, I have added some informations [35][36][37][38][39],[40] but why there is only arabic name for Berber people [41], unlike in french [42] unlike copte people or moroccan people [43], moreover Berber and arabic language are official languages in algeria and M.Bitton didn't want to understand but he let french name which is not an official language in algeria [44],[45] unstead of [46], it's so disrecpecful (even in french wiki there are berber names [47]) or that proves his ignorance about North African culture, that's why I deleted arabic name of berber people who didn't have a berber name [48], so can you unblock me in order to properly bring some informations about berber culture or remove my contributions please.

Decline reason:

You are blocked for sockpuppetry; any further requests that don't address your use of multiple accounts will result in talk page access being revoked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 05:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Someone else will review this request, but as you still haven't addressed your sockpuppetry, or refuse to do so, I do not feel you understand why you have been unblocked, and therefore it will not be safe to let you continue. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 19:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes I understand but I don't know why I'm blocked Except for deleting arabic name of berber speaker who doesn't have berber name, I always try to add informations with sources. In North Africa, berber speakers are stigmatized or arabized [7].

For example, [8] I added source to confirm it's a Berber Dish but it's stil an Arabic Dish. Thank M.Bitton, he knows all process, it's easy for him to block me but he knows nothing about berber culture. [9], so can you unblock this account to add informations about this culture (I swear, I will not delete arabic name for berber speaker) or suppress informations that I have brought. Jesaispas123445 (talk) 13:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

How long will I wait for an answer?Jesaispas123445 (talk) 14:40, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As stated several times above, you need to address your sockpuppetry. You have repeatedly failed to do this, or demonstarted that you understand why you have been blocked. Instead you simply repeat your allegations about berber speakers, which is irrelavent to your block. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 17:15, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

NonameJR, Fasterenergy and AchilleTalonnade, you can check their historics and you will see that I was blocked for deleting arabic name of berber people or adding berber name for berber people or things, like Zirid dinasty, Krim Belkacem, M'semen, Couscous etc. And it's not logic to let french name of algeria which is not an official language and to remove berber names for berber people like Hocine Aït Ahmed.Jesaispas123445 (talk) 18:16, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Sockpuppetry for deleting arabic name of berber people and adding berber name, it's unfair, therefore remove my contributions please or I will do it and nobody can contest it Jesaispas123445 (talk) 12:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked for WP:IDHT. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:42, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.