User talk:Jimmyfact
August 2020[edit]
Hello, I'm Larry Hockett. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 02:54, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
August 2020[edit]
Cullen328 Let's discuss it 04:23, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Unblock appeal[edit]
I am here to contribute and my edits are based on facts of which all edits had supporting links of which most are direct links of supporting content that is in fact on Wikipedia. I contacted the person who administers a locked editing sight to request to input relevant facts in relation to the site matter of which I explained my concern in that the content on the site does not give the reader complete and full information in relation to the historical facts in relation to the content of which I stated examples of several facts to support my claims. It was upon this request to edit the site or add to the site the historical facts that support the claims to which I have direct links to federal archives existing evidence that makes clear the historical facts are true and correct. In response to this request, I was blocked and accused by this page administrator to have acted
" Intense disruptive POV pushing. Failure to provide references to reliable, independent secondary sources."
Of which I do not understand how that is possible in just sending them a request and pointing out several of the concerns I had wished to present to show that this information is missing of factual historical events that I felt are very important content that insure the readers have a complete and full understanding of all historical information relating to the content on the page. I did not actually edit anything on the page as it was a locked edit page, I was making a request to edit the page. I had no ability to edit it or add to it sources or information relating to anything.
I have to assume that person or administrator who blocked me may not wish to state the factual information I had presented for all to see, maybe they have a prejudice or one-sided view in where they themselves do not wish to disclose these historical facts. I am not sure as to what the cause for such extreme action to just a simple request is for. I do not know the administrator who blocked me, I have not had any prior issues with the administrator who blocked. I am a historian that has been studying world history, culture, and religion now for 47 years. It was my goal to present facts in relation to historical evidence that is available to give all who seek the information the clear and truthful view of content with the clear and evident facts that support it as so all are comfortable in trusting in what they are reading on Wikipedia.
Jimmyfact (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
Your edits were extremely unfactual, such as trying to claim that the deomcratic republican party didn't exist. Or for example trying to claim that the Republican party is mentioned in the constitution (it isn't). Regardless, all of your edits are very not neutral, and you are clearly pushing a strong anti-Democrat POV. We don't accept any POV pushers, be they anti-dem, anti-republican, anti-whatever. We present subjects without editorializing, and how they are covered in reliable sources. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 17:06, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
As stated any edits I have done had with them that of clear content of supporting facts that already exist on Wikipedia or links to that of federal archives historical facts to secure the edits or added information is correct and truthful. In relation to the person who blocked me, Again I had not even edited anything on the page as yet, I was simply requesting to have it unlocked to edit or add content.
I request my block be lifted and if this administrator wishes to discuss the subject matter and review its supporting evidence before the edits are published, I am fine with that.
Thank you for your time.
- Saying that you simply request edits are fake, looking at this edit and this edit and several more. I have no expertise in politics shithole, but I know that the Democratic, Republican, whatever shit-name still exists. Saying "Confederate slave states" does not respect WP:NPOV and is a wrong, unofficial name. In this edit, "the free Republic States.." Free???? Since when is your country "free"? Since when are all countries "free"? How would you consider "free"? Free from slavery, no; free from crisis, no; free from Karens and especially Karens on Twitter, no; free from stupidity, no. "Free" is subjective. GeraldWL 06:38, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Unblock[edit]
I am a Republican and clearly you are a prejudice Democrat who can not put aside that of your own personal desire in which you wish to present in the Democratic party. Article 4 Section 4 The United States Constitution is pretty clear 4. "shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government When the Constitution was ratified in 1788 the single-party government of Republican form was the national governing party as and Jefferson and Madison's political party was called just the Republican party" I have read near every letter in the federal archives between Jefferson and Madison and have studied that time very well and never anywhere in that time did anyone ever call their political position the Democratic Republican party, they were only as what was established in the United States Constitution Republicans. The Democratic-Republican party name was only ever mentioned by that name in the time frame of Andrew Johnson who claimed to be a Democrat-Republican of which Andrew Johnson is the father of what is called a "RINO=Republican In Name Only" as he pretended to be a Republican for the benefit of being picked by Republican President Abraham Lincoln, who did pick him as the VP in hopes that his Democratic position may bring matters between the Democratic party Confederate slave states and the Republican Party free Republic states to a compromise that maybe could resolve the issues of the divisive matters which resulted in the civil war of 1861, clearly picking the racist Democrat Andrew Johnson did resolve anything. It is clear you are a DINO" an Ignoant "Democrat in name only: who clearly does not know the truth of the history of the Democratic party and clearly wishes to go by that version that fits your own personal bias if it is the truth or not, clearly you do not care for the truth. In your own draft of the statement of the Democratic-Republican Party, it states as well that this term or party name is fictitious and that in truth the party was just called the Republican party. You clearly wish to present a fake version of right out lies within history just to attempt to make it appear the Democratic party is somehow an establishment of American history when in fact it is not. As in fact, the Democratic party has nothing whatsoever to do with the founding principals of the Republic of the United States of America and in fact is not a party of America, the Proslavery Democratic party was born out of that of the Tory's, the British loyalist who were the enemies within. The Democratic party's first Confederate slave states flag is claimed to have been designed by William Porcher known as the stars and bars with the later national flags being designed by a German artist Nicola Marschall who as well designed the Confederate uniforms. The national Democratic Confederate slave stated flag was designed with the sideways blue Cross of St Andrew of the Scottish Loyalksit to Britain, and with the red backdrop of the Irish Loyalist to great Britain, the stars represented the number of slaves states the Pro-slavery Democratic party Confederation had control of at that time. These are the facts of truth. The Pro-Slavery Democratic party's Confederate slave states wanted a national flag that reflected their alliance to Great Britain as is clear in the letters and direction given to Nicola Marschall who designed it, they had hoped the alliance flag to Great Britain would encourage Great Britain to ally with them in the civil war. Of which evidence exist that shows that just may have, but Russia had informed Great Britain that if they allied with the Pro-Slavery Democratic Party's Confederate Slave states, that Russia would be allied with the Republic of Free United States of America Patriots. Great Britain with the force of the Tory Democrats may have been able to defeat the Republic, but Great Britain knew they could not defeat the Free United States and Russia together, it was Republican Cassius Marcellus Clay who worked on the alliance between the Republic Free United States and Russia and he had great success in forming this alliance in that time. I am sorry to say by your statements. It is clear you have a child-like version of history of that of your own fantasy version. I am confident and sure that any true historian who knows the facts of these matters, see in this matter who is in truth the fool here. Sadly such foolish discriminate people as yourself are the root of the many problems we face in this nation, clearly such people as you have a problem with reality. In my opinion, it is right out disgraceful. I clearly can see their no reasoning with you as it is clear you are an envious prejudice Democrat. I will try to take the matter up directly with Wikipedia.
- Labeling someone a Democrat is considered WP:OUTING, even if it's not true. Also, before you attack me, no, I am an Indonesian nonpartisan. GeraldWL 06:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Outing?[edit]
GeraldWL The person who started the block was User: Cullen328 who clearly states on his site he is a Democrat. Further, I have been studying world history, cultures, and religions for 47 years. In relation to American history, there was no such party as the Democratic-Republican party that existed in the time of Madison and Jefferson. There was in fact only the Republican party of which Jefferson and Madison ran on the Republican ticket as the United States Constitution under article 4 section 4 only consents to a Republican form of government in the free Republic of the United States of America. YOu can search the full United States Constitution and Declaration of independence and you will not find the words Democrat, Democratic, Democracy as these forms of government are the foundation to that of Communist, superior rulers, dictators and totalitarian of America declines, rejects and dissociates with such government forms. The only government form allowed in the United States of America is that of a Republican form of government as guaranteed under USC Article 4 Section 4 that is a clear and unquestionable fact as a Republic is a government of the people, by the people for the people and we the People of America are a self-governing Republic. Further, the Confederate states where the slave states and they where founded under the Democratic party in 1828, The Democratic party was founded as a pro-slavery party to protect the rights of slave owners and to secure the right to slavery, it was the Republicans of the Free Republic United States of America who abolished slavery and who fought and defeated the Pro-slavery Party in the civil war of 1861. Clearly it appears you are not very aware of the history and the facts.
Jimmyfact (talk) 12:38, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
August 2020[edit]
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 23:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
As you are making no apparent efforts to get unblocked, and continue to spout obviously factually wrong material and wasting the time of our editors, I see no reason for you to have access to this page. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 23:01, 29 August 2020 (UTC)