User talk:Jjd27

Welcome!

Hello, Jjd27, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few more good links to help you get started:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 16:07, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Southampton F.C.[edit]

Thanks for reverting the squad number of Inigo Idiakez from 0 to Unknown. As the official site gives him number 0, I thought that was his official number, but it appears to give that number to every new player who hasn't played this season yet. We'll have to wait until the Ipswich match on the 9th September before he is given a permanent number. I'll remove Idiakez from the squad template, and put him back in then, when he has a number. Chris Larkin 18.38, 01 September 2006 (BST)

Southampton F.C.[edit]

You deleted the information about Clive Woodward because you said he had resigned. He had actually resigned as director of football and his current position was technical support director so your deletion was wrong. I'm not sure if this has been corrected yet. Moo01 21.36, 10 September 2006 (GMT)

(Just for the record, I was correct. His job title had changed from Director of Football to Technical Support Director with the change of boardroom staff in June 2006.) Jjd27 21:08, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hagiology_Publishing[edit]

This article is being considered for deletion. I have noticed you have contributed to it in the past. Please visit Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hagiology_Publishing to air your thoughts. Also, if you can help improve the article in anyway, then please do so. Dan K 10:20, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hagiology Publishing for deletion[edit]

The article Hagiology Publishing is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hagiology Publishing (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Pee Jay 17:12, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]