User talk:Jjjjjjjjjj

If anyone does not want to be pinged by me please just let me know

If anyone does not want to be pinged by me please just let me know, and I won't send you any further pings. Jjjjjjjjjj (talk) 19:24, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

^{^{Superscript text}^{^{Superscript text}}}Welcome!

Hello, Jjjjjjjjjj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Funny username you've got there, anyway. — Ambush Commander^(Talk) 22:15, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wiziq jpg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wiziq jpg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:25, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wiziq

The article Wiziq has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This subject does not appear to meet our standards for companies or websites.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tim 1357 ^talk 02:29, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated this article for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WiZiQ —Preceding unsigned comment added by ErikHaugen (talk • contribs) 18:40, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to nomination for deletion for Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/WiZiQ Jjjjjjjjjj (talk) 22:48, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo wiziq.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo wiziq.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 19:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC) (th== Your submission at Articles for creation ==[reply]

Peaceable Kingdom: The Journey Home (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Miniapolis (talk) 11:42, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One problem, though; the image in the infobox is redlinked. Did you upload it with a detailed fair-use rationale? All the best, Miniapolis (talk) 15:51, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, so the image is now uploaded. Since it wasn't in the main namespace the upload script directed me to write the article first. Thanks very much for helping to bring the article along. I could see on Template:AFC_statistics that you accepted it. Jjjjjjjjjj (talk) 22:00, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Alfred P. Sloan, Jr. Prize, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jjjjjjjjjj (talk) 02:59, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Wiziq screenshot.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Wiziq screenshot.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gun politics in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NRA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

The Witness (2000 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jjjjjjjjjj (talk) 05:29, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Screenshot from WizIQ from 5 September 2012.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot from WizIQ from 5 September 2012.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:54, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sully Historic Site citations

Wrote a bunch of code to change the citations on the Sully Historic Site article from the current version to the proposed formatting. Cannot implement this without consensus. Would very much appreciate your opinion at the talk page. Abel (talk) 02:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Resource Bank, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fast Company. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now fixed..... Jjjjjjjjjj (talk) 12:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Embrace (non-profit), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East Meets West. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now fixed..... Jjjjjjjjjj (talk) 12:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Master limited partnership, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chadbourne. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now fixed in this edit by Jasonanaggie....08:12, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jjjjjjjjjj. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jjjjjjjjjj. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Select Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Your survey Link: https://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_5doLcP4RUoTVaKN&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 12:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jjjjjjjjjj. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

USS Congress (1799) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Thomas Pickering

USS Constellation (1797) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Thomas Pickering

USS Constitution (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Thomas Pickering

USS President (1800) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Thomas Pickering

USS United States (1797) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Thomas Pickering

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:39, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Stop pinging me in every talk page message. It’s disruptive and excessive. VAXIDICAE💉 20:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, it's not difficult for me to remove that...Jjjjjjjjjj (talk) 20:58, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

also canvassing a bunch of people to read your diatribe that has no foundation in policy won’t end well. Drop the stick. VAXIDICAE💉 21:01, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

People can certainly say they don't like the idea for any number of reasons. If the consensus was against it back on February 4th I think I would have just moved on to other things. I also think that if enough established editors say Oppose even if they don't have an exact reason that would seem to me like it's basically consensus.

In picking the people I just played it by ear, and I just picked people who had some knowledge of the events as they transpired. Jjjjjjjjjj (talk) 21:14, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

dude. Seriously stop canvassing. This is unacceptable. VAXIDICAE💉 21:20, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pings

Please stop pinging me. You've done so multiple times in recent edits; I'm aware of the discussion – if I want to comment, I will do so. Thanks. Blablubbs|talk 22:04, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the future I'll be aware of that problem. It hadn't occurred to me that that would be an issue. I was just trying to get consensus on the RfC, and so I didn't mean to bother you. Jjjjjjjjjj (talk) 23:02, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked you to stop pinging me. There was no reason whatsoever to do so again here, against my explicit wishes. I do not care if you continue your template crusade, but please do so without notifying me of every step you take. Blablubbs|talk 20:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I didn't think of that. Do you happen to know of any way to link to a userpage without pinging? Jjjjjjjjjj (talk) 20:11, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Noping. But I don't think you need to link my userpage either, nor do you need to mention me at every step of the way. While you've written a 50'000 byte RfC that seems to be mostly about my actions, this isn't about me. If it is, then you've chosen the wrong venue. Blablubbs|talk 20:16, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know about Template:Noping as I wasn't really aware of that, and I don't want to disturb people who specifically ask not to be pinged. Jjjjjjjjjj (talk) 20:30, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since you wrote this immediately after the above discussion, I feel like I need to repeat my request. You have mentioned my name explicitly 15 times in the RfC, despite me not participating here and having expressed that I do not wish to do so. You have also referenced my actions in a myriad of other ways; your initial post is mostly about VentureKit and actions related to it. At least as far as I can tell, the RfC is about a simple change to a template, and not about me; since you've done this in a bunch of other places as well, I can't help but feel genuinely hounded. Could you please stop referencing me and my actions in basically every post you make? If you have an issue with my conduct or a sockpuppet investigation I filed, bring it up here or on my talk page. Blablubbs|talk 02:49, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. So, after I wrote the above message, which included the phrase Could you please stop referencing me and my actions in basically every post you make?, your next on-wiki action was to write an off-topic post that included a giant blockquote of me. Tell me if I'm missing something, but I'm struggling to understand why you thought that was necessary. The pinging is not my main problem, it's your unwavering insistence on involving me in basically any project-space post that you make; at this point, you're pretty close to the line of harassment, deliberately or not.

Can I also ask whether you had anything to do with a blocked UPE sock that I

Did not block
Did not tag
Did not file at SPI
Did not ever interact with
To my knowledge, mentioned only a single time in a very long list of blocked UPE sockpuppets

emailing me out of the blue and suggesting that they "had read" that I would be able to get them unblocked, which curiously came at a time when you indirectly mentioned them on-wiki? Blablubbs|talk 19:49, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was just seeking to apply reasonable judgment to matters, but I wasn't trying to hound anybody.

The question was on the severity of undisclosed paid editing. A small but basically regular company getting an essentially accurate stub Wikipedia article on them didn't seem to me that it was as serious as something like efforts to try to libel a very prominent person or to influence major significant legal proceedings. Among other things you spoke about how sockfarms tried to whitewash a pollution scandal, and so it seemed reasonable to mention that as an example of a severe issue.

I've been away from Wikipedia for a few months, but I checked back about a week and a half ago, and saw that the proposal to delete the templates didn't get consensus approval. An overwhelming majority of people on the site take the view that it's okay to keep those templates, and that that's a reasonable way for Wikipedia to go moving forward.

The RfC that I proposed has not been formally closed; however, similar to the proposal to delete the templates most people said, Oppose. It seemed to be going that way back in late March.

I think it's okay as in any kind of democratic process whether it's a religious group meeting, or a US state legislature, or the US Congress, or a European parliament there's going to be instances where a proposal or a bill doesn't get sufficient support, but I'm glad that here on Wikipedia people (including myself) got a chance to have their say.

People on the site didn't think that that was a good idea.

As to questions on someone who was blocked that contacted you I haven't looked into that in detail, but I'm not sure readily what it is that that is referring to. Perhaps activity in one part or another stimulated some action to be taken.

Jjjjjjjjjj (talk) 20:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked you for 24 hours because you have continued to ping users and canvass for your desired template changes despite being asked repeatedly to not do so. If you confirm that you will not leave further messages canvassing users, that you will not ping other users when they have asked you not to ping them, and that you'll tidy up the mess you have created, I will unblock you. Nick (talk) 22:06, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken a look at Wikipedia:Canvassing and I see now how Blablubbs got the pings from the edit to the talk page for Cookywook who works for Monzo. It wasn't my intention in any way to try to create excessive noise or to bother people unnecessarily. The number of people that I slated was 13, and so I've sent message to 11 of them so far. In no way was I trying to pick people who would support that addition. Nobody responded, and I was just trying to get it squared away.

I think it's okay by me to just hold off on the other edits that I queued up, and see how the discussion unfolds. So far there's been nobody who has said Support and all the other editors have said Oppose though Thryduulf spoke about the plan of deleting the template. Jjjjjjjjjj (talk) 23:02, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, Jjjjjjjjjj. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Anne (talk) 21:26, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of WizIQ for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WizIQ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WizIQ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

RPSkokie (talk) 09:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oklo (disambiguation)

The article Oklo (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary disambiguation page, see WP:ONEOTHER

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. B3251 (talk) 20:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable to delete as not needed currently. Could be recreated if necessary. Jjjjjjjjjj (talk · contribs) 07:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]