User talk:Jlp504/sandbox

Peer review by K.Lip

I am looking for your draft of the article you are trying to expand on. Have you already added your information directly to the page? The article page itself looks like it has a lot of information on it. I will look at your sandbox tomorrow to see if any type of draft is there so I can review what you have done to see if there is any way I can help you if you need to make additions or changes.

K.Lip (talk) 18:56, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Since there is no expanded draft, I can only review your thoughts on this topic. I reviewed the article page and saw a lot of information with no references; trying to find references for everything that is there will help this article be neutral and reliable. There could be more hyperlinks to some words as well like Konrad Lorenz. All of the ideas that you have to add to the page sound very good, and will add a lot more depth to this start article. K.Lip (talk) 12:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review (Jessica)

I see what you plan on contributing to the article is very similar to what we covered in class when we did the fixed action patterns. I suggest adding some examples that we haven’t gone over just so it doesn’t get as repetitive when you do your short presentation.

I also noticed that there is quite a bit of information within the article that has not been cited. It’s important to make sure that all the information in your article has proper references. Overall, your outline looks good and I look forward to reading the final article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessicabadcock (talk • contribs) 17:58, 23 October 2017 (UTC)