User talk:Jmaurone

Please do not remove my edit. Any entry on criticisms should be met with a reasonable response to those criticisms in the name of a fair and balanced portrayal. The rule of Wikipedia, I believe, is not to intend harm. If a response to Rand's critics are constantly removed, that is an indication that there is malicious intent to smear someone's character. Jmaurone (talk) 20:29, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The change that you opposed was already discussed on the Ayn Rand talk page and a consensus was reached. Any edits that you want to make should be dicussed there. Idag (talk) 20:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please work with the Consensus

Based on the RFc on the Ayn Rand page, there is no consensus to support the edits and deletions made by one faction following the Dec 31 freeze. The vote as to whether there was a consensus for the changes was 9 to 3 against, 7 to 5 if one counts only experienced editors, and adds votes for two editors who commented but did not make an explicit vote. In either case, a minority, no matter how vocal (the talk page has never been so large, and so empty) cannot claim to have established a new consensus.

Hence, we shall revert to the actual consensus version of Dec 31, and I respectfully request that all editors accept and defend this long standing consensus version as the starting point for new edits. Reversions to the controversial shortened article should not be supported against the vote of the RFC. I request that those who wish to modify the article state the changes they want on the talk page, and request a vote for the changes they wish to make. I request that editors not simply assert that there is a new consensus for deletions as has been done, since the RFC clearly shows that this is not the case.

If you have suggestions for improving the article (I support trimming down all sections which have their own separate wikipedia article, such as Objectivist movement) please discuss them, conscisely now, but let us not revert to an edit war. Kjaer (talk) 01:05, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ayn Rand

Hi, I've filed an RfM on Ayn Rand, including as parties only those who've recently edited the article. However, as you've commented on talk, you might want to be involved too. If so, please add your name to the list of parties at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Ayn Rand. Cheers, SlimVirgin ^{talk|contribs} 02:25, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi J, I was hoping you'd sign on for mediation. There's a lot of interest and I think it would be great if you would participate. Thanks. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:17, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]