User talk:Jmcrownpoint

I would like to contribute to what I know about and enjoy - traditional hot rods and Southern California hot rod culture. Maybe contemporary definitions and positive contributions are NOT what wikipedia is about? PT Cruiser links and no Hot Rod Surf under Hot Rods? It is academically wrong and plain lame.(Jmcrownpoint 11:09, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jmcrownpoint (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

See [1] for unblock request: request contained personal attacks.

Decline reason:

Reading this and a similar request on User_talk:Hotrodsurf seems to make sockpuppetry a reasonable conclusion

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikirat[edit]

wikirat is a wikipedia user who deletes links and files without adding to the discussion of the articles or links selected to deletion. A common technique of the wkikrat is to report a legitimate article and then when the responses or comments come in claim sock puppets. Wikirats are not concerned with helping evolve a real counter-culture dictionary and open environment where everyone contributes. The Wikirat is preoccupied with the ratting and deleting combination and technical conflicts rather that the importance of information conveyed in wikipedia. Wikirats are a negative force in Wikipedia. Like a common house rat Wikirats scurry around Wikipedia steeling and spreading the disease of technicality in stead of Reality.(Jmcrownpoint 6:04, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Right, I protest ANY sort of unblocking for this user. This user CONTINUES to make personal attacks by calling myself a wikirat in blatant violation of Wikipedia policy, after being warned NOT to do so. --Signed and Sealed, JJJJust (T C) 03:51, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to target users' pages for vandalism you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The userpages in question are User:JJJJust and User:Infrogmation

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Wikirat, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks.

--Signed and Sealed, JJJJust (T C) 07:47, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Linkspamming[edit]

Please stop adding commercial or personal-website links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. JChap2007 09:23, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPA[edit]

Please stop making personal attacks against other contributors. If you continue to do so, this page will be protected, making it impossible for you to edit it. Iola k ana•T 15:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution[edit]

“Wikirat” is no different of a term than "Infogmation" they are just presented differently. One is using a "user name" to convey a type of definition rather than an article. It seems as if the user "infrogmation" wants to expose acts of obscuring sources though altering original documents. ‘Wkirat’ is not meant to be derogatory but rather describe a situation which is part of Wkikipedia. Here is a ‘cleaned up’ definition of Wikirat for others enjoy and use when appropriate.

Wikirat[edit]

wikirat is a wikipedia user who deletes links and text without adding to the discussion page of the articles or links selected for deletion or earmarks. A common technique is to report a new article with technical earmarks such as “unverifiable” and then when the sources or comments are posted for “verification” a claim ‘sock puppets’ is filed followed by a “Bock-User” earmarking. A Wikirat is preoccupied with the ratting and deleting combination and technical conflicts rather that the actual content of the information of an article for wikipedia.(Jmcrownpoint 11:09, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

HOW IT IS POSSIBLE?!!!!![edit]

How is it possible?! that an external link section from the Hot Rod article page has been deleted for the official “free” Hot Rod Surf website while a commercial PT cruiser link exists! Who supports this?? Why not discuss it in the discussion page. Keep all of the links- don’t delete any of them. Add do not subtract from wikipedia.(Jmcrownpoint 11:20, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Grey Baskerville has left the building[edit]

After surviving AfDs, Doug Thorley and Magoo are still up, but both could use better sourcing. I'm wondering if you've got back issues of Hot Rod, Car Craft, National Dragster, & the like that would help. Ditto on Jake, Showboat, The Mantaray, Ed Donovan, Donovan hemi, Silhouette, and a few others I've created lately. (Have a look at my userpage under the "Open Vanity" 3&4.) Any help you can be would be very much appreciated. TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 06:10, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]