User talk:Jmorgana2

File copyright problem with File:Ricflipper1964.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Ricflipper1964.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sherool (talk) 23:45, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:RicDolphin.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:RicDolphin.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.amazon.com/o/ASIN/1580631010. As a copyright violation, File:RicDolphin.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:RicDolphin.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:RicDolphin.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at File talk:RicDolphin.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:RicDolphin.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 03:22, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:GaylenRoss2.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:GaylenRoss2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Ze'evKasztnerAssassin.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Ze'evKasztnerAssassin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:KasztnerTrial.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:KasztnerTrial.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:57, 7 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:57, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:KasztnerChildren.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:KasztnerChildren.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:57, 7 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:57, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:KasznterPhoto.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:KasznterPhoto.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:57, 7 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:57, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Ric O'Barry. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 22:37, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:KasznterPhoto.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:KasznterPhoto.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.68.185 (talk) 03:45, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:KasztnerChildren.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:KasztnerChildren.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.68.185 (talk) 03:45, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:GaylenRoss2.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:GaylenRoss2.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.68.185 (talk) 03:47, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Cove OPSTeam.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Cove OPSTeam.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 02:45, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All claims of "I got permission from..." need to be verified by the actual copyright holder(s). This must be done by folloiwng the instructions at WP:OTRS. Skier Dude (talk) 04:00, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Kasztner photo.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Kasztner photo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 23:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:TheCove rockcamera.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:TheCove rockcamera.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:11, 27 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 23:11, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to File:Kasztner photo.jpg‎, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 23:20, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DAJF, I have referenced the site where the image comes from and referenced the person (in this case the family) that created the image. What else needs to be added to the citation. Please be specific.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to File:Kasztner photo.jpg. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tresiden (talk) 23:34, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to The Cove (film). December21st2012Freak ^{Halloween is coming} 23:35, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain to me how this is vandalization. I am editing the page so that is more educationally informative and rich. It contains photos approved by the makers of the film. I have permission to use these photos as does anyone who visits their site. If you would so prefer I can provide documentation from the filmmakers dictating that these images can be used. Please be specific with your responses.

You need to provide information on exactly where these images come from so that the copyright status can be verified by other editors. I have looked at the official Cove website and can find no explicit indication that images there have been released to the public domain. --DAJF (talk) 23:43, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The images were created by Gina Papabeis, a crew member and personal assistant to the director, Louie Psihoyos. She has personally emailed the photos to me, though many of the photos can be taken from the official movie website. I will email Gina and ask her to provide documentation stating that the photos are up for use by the public. Please allow 24 hours for documentation to be provided.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmorgana2 (talk • contribs) 23:48, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no immediate hurry, as I believe there is a 7-day period for users to verify the image source and copyright status. You (and Gina Papabeis) should read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for information on how to clarify formal copyright permission for image use on Wikipedia. Also, if you are in contact with the image owner, please request larger resolution original versions rather than the tiny images currently used. Thanks. --DAJF (talk) 00:00, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]