User talk:JoeLeboe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bluedude588, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Woodroar (talk) 23:38, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JoeLeboe (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was falsely blocked just for voting in an Articles for Deletion discussion. I didn't really even pay much attention to any of the other voters' usernames; all I was doing was going in the direction that felt most natural to me. You know, evaluating the cases one by one, responding to the users, etc. As such, I would like to be re-admitted into "The Free Encyclopedia".

You have two options, whether you now believe that I am not really a sock puppet account of Bluedude588, like the sock puppet investigations say.

1. If you do believe me, you will give me a second chance to explain any mistakes that I have made, and how to correct them, so that I can avoid getting blocked again. I am willing to do anything to get unblocked, even if it means abstaining from all Articles for Deletion discussions from now on.

2. If you don't believe that I am not a sock puppet of Bluedude588, you will not release my block, but you will block Bluedude588 as well. For some reason, he is not blocked, even though he is the original user. And when I have thought upon my mistakes and why sock puppetry is bad, I will wait awhile, and then will log onto Bluedude588 and apologize for the confusion.

Thanks, and have a nice day. JoeLeboe (talk) 00:10, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

TPA revoked. ST47 (talk) 00:23, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.