User talk:Joe Forkeybolo

Notability of RedandNater.com

A tag has been placed on RedandNater.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, since it is a shitty fucking article about a shitty fucking website that destroys people's lives with fucking lies and gossip. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix_talk 22:21, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of RedandNater.com

An article that you have been involved in editing, RedandNater.com, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RedandNater.com. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Corvus cornix_talk 22:40, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RedandNater.com, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Corvus cornix_talk 22:47, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page RedandNater.com do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bezboard\.com\b' .

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 23:57, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:36, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of RedandNater.com

I have nominated RedandNater.com, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RedandNater.com (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. NW (Talk) 21:45, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Forkeybolo

Hey, can anyone delete Joe Forkeybolo? Like, can you please drive to where he's from and throw him off a bridge. See, he wrote an article about a shitty fucking website that wrecks people's lives, and deserves to rot in a prison cell with an electric prod up his ass. Just a thought. Thanks in advance to deleting Joe Forkeybolo.

Richard Nolan

Why do you keep re-adding information to Richard Nolan regarding the price of milk in 1980? It's not relevant. Arbor8 (talk) 17:56, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have quarrel with my statistics? I quoted the source. If you are saying that historical references to the 1980's are not relevant to contemporary discussion, then I think you owe it to the readers to remove all references to Rick Nolan's congressional service. The world was a much different place three decades ago. Quoting prices of the day allows people to make a more apples-to-apples comparison. Joe Forkeybolo (talk) 06:18, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No. The article is about Nolan, not the price of milk in 1980, or Oberstar's age, or anything else. Please stop making unconstructive edits. Arbor8 (talk) 18:29, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Rick Nolan. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Arbor8 (talk) 14:53, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Jeff PortfolioPicture.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jeff PortfolioPicture.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Jeff PortfolioPicture.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Jeff PortfolioPicture.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. dave pape (talk) 00:37, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of RedandNater.com (third nomination) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RedandNater.com (third nomination) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RedandNater.com (third nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ubelowme _U ^Me 19:12, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]