User talk:John Jaffar Janardan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your Teahouse Question[edit]

No one answered your question, and I'm not familiar with how to answer what you asked, so try asking again.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:55, 10 July 2016 (UTC)}}[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 06:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Jaffar Janardan Talk

Request for deletion - Rachna Sharma[edit]

Dear John, as you have requested for page deletion of Rachna Sharma, i would like to clarify that this page refers to Rachna Sharma who is a life strategist against air hostess as in the article referred by you.Jalsut (talk) 09:56, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yusuf al-Hindi[edit]

You PRODded this article, someone removed the PROD-template. As the template says... Do no replace it. If you insist, take it to AfD. Kleuske (talk) 08:57, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally... You may want to check your signature. It's missing a closing 'sup'-tag and messes up subsequent text. Kleuske (talk) 08:58, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have any customized signature. --John Jaffar Janardan (talk) 04:02, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ayad al-Jumaili[edit]

Hi, I wanted to let you know that I have declined you speedy deletion request of Ayad al-Jumaili because I think being a senior leader of ISIL is a credible claim of significance. This of course doesn't mean he is notable, so feel free to take it to WP:AfD if you still think it should be deleted. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:13, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

John Jaffar Janardan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The blocking administrator didn't mention, why was I blocked. I didn't create any sock accounts. My ISP is very popular. Every third IP has edits, some trace back to 2014. Some of my IPs don't have any edits. Some IPs edited two times, some one, some even 10 times. I didn't make those edits. I opened my account 7 months ago, and actively edited for more than a month. John Jaffar Janardan (talk) 13:26, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block; please appeal via WP:UTRS. MER-C 06:27, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

John Jaffar Janardan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16534 was submitted on Sep 15, 2016 01:39:04. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 01:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

John Jaffar Janardan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My UTRS request was denied with a statement "Check users confirms, you have engaged in socking. As long as you create accounts, we will keep blocking them." What accounts, which accounts? Can you be more specific? Repeating The blocking administrator didn't mention, why was I blocked. I didn't create any sock accounts. My ISP is very popular. Every third IP has edits, some trace back to 2014. Some of my IPs don't have any edits. Some IPs edited two times, some one, some even 10 times. I didn't make those edits. I opened my account 7 months ago, and actively edited for more than a month. If I would have been a sock, why I was not blocked in February when I logged in last time. --John Jaffar Janardan (talk) 05:28, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you want a more specific answer, you will need to contact WP:UTRS again, as a reviewing admin here will not have access to their checkuser results. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:55, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:John_Jaffar_Janardan&oldid=829101036"