Jump to content

User talk:John Millikin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, John Millikin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Ali K 04:19, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

[edit]
Hello, John Millikin. Based on the templates on your talk page, I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. Note:Keep in mind that Squadron members officially state they are not inclusionists. ~~~~

Careful

[edit]

Although your recent edit to the Miller article did indeed improve it, I must ask that you refrain from using abusive language in your edit summaries. DS (talk) 04:28, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LinkedIn

[edit]

Hi. Please note that Wikipedia requires reliable sources for any information about living persons. LinkedIn and other social networking sites are not considered reliable sources and may not be used to source such information. I refer to your recent edit to Access Co. Thanks! Yworo (talk) 22:09, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On maintaining the utility of the label "science fiction"

[edit]

Thank you for this - it is a pet peeve of mine that media is so often labeled "science fiction" simply because the magic comes from a shiny metal box instead of an incantation. Of course, on this site we need to bow to how other people describe the film, but that does not make the misuse of terminology any less silly. I have not seen that film yet - no spoilers, please. - 2/0 (cont.) 05:01, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]