User talk:Johnwh

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:68 lsso de mont.jpeg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:68 lsso De mont.jpeg. The copy called Image:68 lsso De mont.jpeg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 00:00, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:68 lsso de mont 2.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:68 lsso de mont 2.jpeg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:75 shallot small.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:75 small shalott.jpg. The copy called Image:75 small shalott.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 20:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:64 Eric.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:64 Eric.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 12:49, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright tags

Hi, John - I saw your post on ElinorD's talk page and took a look at Image:64 Eric.jpg and fixed the problems. The main problem was that it was missing a copyright tag. I presumed the GFDL license, please feel free to change to something else if you prefer. The image is also missing a description. Please see Help:Image page for more info on uploading images, and drop me a line with any questions. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 15:31, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Dead in tune session.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Dead in tune session.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:16, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need description for 64 Eric.jpg

Hi! I was going through the Images for renaming category and found your image, 64 Eric.jpg. If you would, it would be helpful if you were to upload the image with a more descriptive filename and provide a description, then mark the original with {{db-redundant|New filename.jpg}}. Thanks! Incidentally, what's this image for? It's not used anywhere. Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 00:31, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:68 lsso de mont.jpeg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:68 lsso de mont.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. B (talk) 22:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:64 Eric.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:64 Eric.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Undeath (talk) 02:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Loughran.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Loughran.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:17, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Leicestershire Schools Symphony Orchestra page

Hello John. The article on the Leicestershire Schools Symphony Orchestra is simply too long. I suggest you peruse articles for other orchestras, such as the Berlin Philharmonic, Cleveland Orchestra, etc., and use those for a template. While I appreciate the hard work you've put into the article, it's far too long. There are also too many photos. These take up bandwidth which costs Wikipedia money. You might also want to look over Wikipedia's manual of style. While the article as written by you is wonderful, it's not appropriate for an online encyclopedia and is more appropriate for a tribute page. I recommend you include a link to your own page within the External Links section of the article. I have reinserted the length tag, but left the information you've added back in untouched for now. Please do not remove the tag until the article has been trimmed.THD3 (talk) 13:05, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, John. Please expedite trimming the Leicestershire Schools Symphony Orchestra page, as it remains far too long. Certain sections, such as those concerning compositions premiered by the Orchestra, should be given their own articles. If you need help with reducing them, please ask on my talk page. I will wait a few days, and if the article remains overly long, will submit a request for mediation.THD3 (talk) 14:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reinserted the length tag. Please do not delete it until the article is no longer than 10,000 bytes (currently, it's over 57,000).THD3 (talk) 13:54, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article is still far too long. As yuo appear to be inactive, I am severely trimming the article to bring it into conformation with Wikipedia guidelines on appropriate length.THD3 (talk) 14:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

URGENT My article, that took many moths to write has been decimated. Where do I get my original text from, please. I accept that you don't want this article on Wiki but I would like to retrieve the information. Can you help please. John Whitmore

If you go to the article's page, and click on the 'history' link at the top, you'll be taken to a page that shows previous incarnations of the article. I just checked and the history is still there.THD3 (talk) 16:25, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. I've found it. Do you know of a website where I can post this article in its entirety (preferably free of charge)?

File permission problem with File:64 Eric Pinkett.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:64 Eric Pinkett.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 12:55, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question about all of your image uploads

I noticed that most all of your images are marked as "Own photograph"/"own photo" and some are marked as "own artwork", but only one was marked as "This is my own personal photograph taken in 1964". Wikipedia needs to make sure that all of your image uploads are properly licensed and attributed to the correct copyright holders. The summary's you have provided are too vague. I would recommend you go through every image and place the summary template found in the Mini how-to onto the image pages. Please fill an individual one out for each image - try to not cut and paste. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:45, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Time small.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Time small.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:54, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Lsso website.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lsso website.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:55, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Time 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Time 1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:56, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

WP:PUF#All Uploads of User:Johnwh -FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:41, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]