User talk:Jomaxwell

This is Jomaxwell's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Melodica Music & Dance Institute (October 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Source 1 is a primary source, source 2 is a business listing, and sources 3, 4, and 5 are all the same press release. All of these sources (1,2,3,4,5) are not suitable for Wikipedia. Please cite reliable sources per WP:SIRS. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 08:25, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Johannes, Thank you for your message could you please help me with the citation. Please let me know what kind of source need to update as a citation. I am hardly trying to publish this article on Wikipedia. Please help me to publish this article and it would be a great help from you. I really apricates if you could help me to get it accepted.

I have referred some other Wikipedia pages for citation and find few are mentioned listing and press release for their citation.

Here I have mentioned news from Khaleej times, and few other news sites for the citation apart from listing and press release could you please let me know if that is a good fit.

Thank you

Regards,

Jomaxwell Jomaxwell (talk) 15:15, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Melodica Music & Dance Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 08:25, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can any one create an article for me[edit]

Can any one create an article for me Jomaxwell (talk) 10:01, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Melodica Music Academy (January 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources are a mix of churnalism, routine business reporting, and primary sources, none of which contributes towards notability per WP:NCORP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Melodica Music Academy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jomaxwell! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Jomaxwell. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Melodica Music Academy, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Melodica Music Academy, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Jomaxwell, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jomaxwell|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:24, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jomaxwell, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Jomaxwell24 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:59, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Melodica Music Academy moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Melodica Music Academy 2. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copypaste move and related matters[edit]

You appear to have created Melodica Music Academy by copypasting from the declined draft Draft:Melodica Music Academy. Please do not do that, as it creates all sorts of problems which other editors then have to clean up.

I have moved your article into the draft space; you can find it at Draft:Melodica Music Academy 2.

Also, do not create multiple copies of the same content. Again, this causes various problems.

If you have a conflict of interest (COI) with regards to this subject, you are not allowed to publish the article anyway, and must instead go through the AfC review process as you were earlier doing. Please also disclose your COI, as instructed in the earlier threads on this page.

Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not paid article, Why are you troubling me , please make it back to the normal, I am back of this from last one year , please dont do this Jomaxwell (talk) 10:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is your relationship to this company? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:48, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly understand my concerns , 1 year I spent for this article to get published in wikipedia. please accept it, If you found any mistake please edit it and support me do not delete or move it. very hard to see that it moving to the draft. consider my request please. i have all reliable sources from news, websites and authentic sources. Jomaxwell (talk) 10:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't answer my question. What is your relationship to this company? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I dont have any relationship I was a student of them, And when I am in to wikipedia I wanted to create page for this company. Jomaxwell (talk) 10:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Really? User Jomaxwell24 (your other account, presumably?) was calling this "my business", which doesn't sound like something an ex-student would say. Think carefully now – do you work for this company, are you a shareholder or director of this company, and/or do you have any other external ('real life') relationship with it? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:19, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shareholder or director of this company, Do you think Then I will be here sitting and editing Wikipedia, I want to create multiple projects in Wikipedia , and when I am trying to achieve my dreams nobody is supporting. When I started editing wikipedia for the first time someone told me to use paid templates, then when I used other person told not to use that. I was seeking for help nobody is helping only advising. Now some how i have did something and you are moving it instead of supporting. Jomaxwell (talk) 11:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so you're not a shareholder or director; fine. Why did you call it "my business", then? And one more time: what is your relationship to this company? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Jomaxwell, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jomaxwell,

If you are looking for help as a new editor, this is where you need to go. You already have one message about the Teahouse but here is another. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think any experienced editors are here to support the new editors, None of them are supportive all are playing with the power they have Jomaxwell (talk) 07:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop moving your draft to mainspace, you have a conflict of interest and need to submit the draft for review. Theroadislong (talk) 08:53, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No COI, and I need to know Why you people are rejecting there is no promotional language and it is with enough citations Its easy for you to move to the draft, Mention all the promotional words here or and let me know which citation is not enough I can bring pages here which doesnt have no good citation compared to those articles it is far bettew. Jomaxwell (talk) 09:10, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See other crap exists for that argument. Theroadislong (talk) 09:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You still haven't explained why your alter-ego referred to this as "my business", if you have no relationship to the company. And no, I'm not buying that ex-student story, sorry. Until we get to the bottom of this issue, this should remain in the draft space.

May I also once more draw your attention to our policy on using multiple accounts. Please read and understand it, if you haven't yet done so. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I told you know, when i did some research I saw I have to add that template to make an article and that was mistake. Help me , dont criticize if it is a mistake help me to correct it. Why you are not giving a hand . I am using only this account other account is not there. I saw you never accepted none of the articles from anyone. why you do this, why dont you help Jomaxwell (talk) 09:21, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh you blocked me Jomaxwell (talk) 09:22, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Cryptic 09:20, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jomaxwell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Some one blocked me for creating the article, I have not used any promotional language, Its not fair to block with out proper reason, if any helping hand here please check the article i was editing and the citation. there is nothing promotion or falt details

Decline reason:

Confirmed to Jomaxwell24 which noted this was your business. Confirmed to Melodica Music & Dance School and to Ashuazpire. You must think we are stupid. We are not. Yamla (talk) 11:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

DoubleGrazing unblock me please Jomaxwell (talk) 10:57, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing admin: it was the deleted history of Draft:Melodica Music & Dance Institute and the contibs of this user's other account User:Jomaxwell24 in particular that convinced me that the current protestations of uninvolvement aren't credible. —Cryptic 10:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't unblock you if I wanted to, as I'm not an administrator. Not to mention that I think there is much more to this than first meets the eye. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:01, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do under stand, I have created an account in the name Jomaxwell24 when I forgot the user login details, I have started a new account. I was new to wikipedia asked for help to create articles in wikipedia , Nobody helps me, SOme how I my self managed to create it by me. I wish create an article for three topics, Melodica, Burjuman Mall, Zahia Mall where I have credible citation sources and I believe which is good to be in the wiki pedia page. I have not used any promotional or advertainment language but every one is saying the source is not reliable, content is promotional which is not. I am sad to see this comments and i am sure the citations are credible. I used only credible sources like Gulf news, Khaleej Times, Bayut any one can verify that. Nobody search about the history of article instead you just deleted it and blocked me. Please do understand if you feel there is promotional or advertisement language please edit it or advice me which words i need to avoid. Blocking me is not a solution, you are just making me hopeless and sad. Please I have only this account now and help me with article creation dont block and please give the article back. I hope you will not let me down. I dont want to say good bye to wikipedia Jomaxwell (talk) 11:10, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cryptic: please Jomaxwell (talk) 11:12, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may also wish to modify your website so it isn't so blatantly using fake AI content. That was some of the most blatantly obvious image fakery I've ever seen. Yuck. Combined with your attempts to mislead us here, this raises real concerns about your approach. --Yamla (talk) 11:17, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks good work, appreciate suddenly came from somewhere and did all this. I already said it was my accounts and you think you did a big investigation. No dear , i dont mind do watever you want I leaving no need of any account. Thank s for everyone for all this support and help. Good bye Jomaxwell (talk) 11:33, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]