User talk:Jon1990

Welcome!

Hello, Jon1990, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Soothing R 08:40, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Dallas, Texas[edit]

Your edit to Dallas, Texas has been identified as vandalism. It appeared that you were trying to remove references to Dallas as a culturally diverse place in terms of race, political stance, and sexual identity. If you would like to contribute to the article or have sound reasoning for your edits, you may discuss them at Talk:Dallas, Texas. Other than that, happy editing! drumguy8800 C T 06:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Abortion[edit]

Do not add improperly licensed images to any article. Do not add images to Abortion, an article for which images have had a long history of debate, without first gaining consensus on the talk page. KillerChihuahua^?!? 01:15, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey man, i thought they were appropriate images. good for you--Piemanmoo 01:18, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:6848683.jpg[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:6848683.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:6848683.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:6848683.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:52, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Tom Leppert[edit]

Your recent edits to the Tom Leppert article include the addition of a section entitled "Personal". The text of this section was copied from Mr. Leppart's campaignb website[1]; as such it is subject to copyright restrictions and has been deleted. If you wish to add information to this article, please do not copy it, rather write it in your own words. Thank you. — ERcheck (talk) 04:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ani life is so good.gif listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ani life is so good.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — ERcheck (talk) 11:14, 25 June 2007 (UTC) — ERcheck (talk) 11:14, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Dallas, Texas has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 17:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Native Missionary Movement has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Avnjay^Talk 23:45, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:King's logo.jpg}[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:King's logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:36, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:King's logo.jpg}[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:King's logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:36, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Sheila Jackson-Lee, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Loonymonkey (talk) 02:13, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Barack Obama, you will be blocked from editing. DD2K (talk) 23:19, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you change Barack Obama's religion to agnostic without any shred of reference, proof or common knowledge? (1tephania (talk) 01:13, 26 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]

October 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Native Missionary Movement has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. -down load ׀ sign! 01:33, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Harper hhdl.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Harper hhdl.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:20, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]