User talk:Jonaldinho2004

Image copyright problem with Image:Agbonlahorimage.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Agbonlahorimage.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Craiggardnerimage.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Craiggardnerimage.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:46, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Footy pages

You hagve recently created a lot of very short football biography pages. I would suggest you add a stub tag to them. For the proper stubs please see: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Stub_types#Sport_biography. That helps other editors familiar in the area notified of the need for article expansion.--Tainter 01:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aston Villa F.C.

I have reverted your edits to the Current squad section of the Aston villa f.c. page because you ignored the hidden text and did not reference your amendments. Until the season starts there will undoubtedly be much speculation. If you have a reputable source for your amendments then please add it, but i cannot find any statement releasing the squad numbers. I have left a note on the Talk:Aston Villa F.C. page about amending the current squad section. Any questions can be left on my talk page. Thanks Woodym555 21:57, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Either you jumped the gun or i was too far behind! Given the incredible accuracy of your squad list changes, you are either a player or someone who read the news article that i failed to find! ;) I am sorry for reverting your edits, but could you please provide a reference next time? Thanks Woodym555 23:40, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Player Stats

Can you check to see if the stats you enter are correct? You just changed 6-7 Villa players' stats incorrectly after I had updated them correctly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mozman (talk • contribs) 19:55, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aston Villa reserves

I have removed much of the information regarding the Hong Kong soccer sevens tournament from the Aston Villa reserves page. I think that it fails the guidelines laid out at WP:RECENT. In one years time would we really want an indepth, game by game, detailed account of a single, low-ranked tournament? I recommend making a page for the Hong Kong Sevens tournament and much of the information could go there. Any questions can be left on my talk page. Thanks Woodym555 23:38, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stats in footballer infoboxes

Hi, you're probably not aware of this, but the stats for football player infoboxes (e.g. for Kevin Phillips) are for league appearances only. Therefore, a number of the changes you have recently made will need to be reverted back. Sorry! --Jameboy 16:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just one other thing - if you do update the infobox stats, such as with Martin Laursen, please can you update the timestamp in either the pcupdate parameter (when updating club stats) or ntupdate (when updating national team stats). That way it is easy to tell when the stats were updated, and the info isn't misleading. You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp with five tildes (~). Cheers. --Jameboy 22:12, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you read your talk page? Please can you note the above. Thanks. --Jameboy 00:34, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary

Hi, please could you always fill in the Edit summary when making edits. It makes it easier for other users to see what you have done. Cheers. --Jameboy 23:09, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Aston Villa F.C. Reserves and Academy. Thank you. Woodym555 23:26, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jonathan Hogg

A tag has been placed on Jonathan Hogg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 08:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Albrighton

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Marc Albrighton, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Oo7565 17:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Chris Herd

A tag has been placed on Chris Herd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hammer1980·^talk 00:23, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan Delfouneso

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Nathan Delfouneso, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In case you haven't found it yet, the discussion about keeping/deleting it can be found here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Delfouneso (3rd nomination). As the article creator, I think it would be good if you could contribute to the debate. At the very least, you'll be able to see how the decision (when it is eventually reached) to keep/delete the article was made. I have no idea how this is going to go - I and a fair few others are voting to keep it, but there are more than a few who think it should be deleted.

The argument for deletion is about the players lack of notability. However, it does look like (now he has been signed for a major team) he will shortly become notable. Those of us who want it kept is because it will save you (or others) having to recreate it from scratch should he become notable. Those against are taking the stance that he isn't notable yet, and he might not become notable - Wikipedia isn't a crystal ball. To be honest, posting the article was a bit premature, but as it is here, I think it should stay for a while, to give him chance to become notable. My opinion might not be enough, so I would thoroughly recommend copying the page as it stands and saving it, just in case it does get deleted. Should he play for the major team and become notable, then you should find recreating this page a lot easier. StephenBuxton (talk) 12:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Avfc1delfouneso2.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Avfc1delfouneso2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 16:47, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Delfounesochasetown.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Delfounesochasetown.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Delfounesochasetown.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 08:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barry Bannan

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Barry Bannan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Earls

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Danny Earls, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:01, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Lichaj

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Eric Lichaj, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:01, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Erik Lund

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Erik Lund, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adam McGurk

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Adam McGurk, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Gucher

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Robert Gucher, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andreas Weimann

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Andreas Weimann, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Need your help

Hi there Jonaldinho2004, as the section header suggests, I could do with your help. I need the Aston Villa F.C. statistics and records article to be referenced. Try as I might I can't find any references for the International section, specifically the first World Cup appearances and goals. Given that you added most, if not all, of these, you wouldn't happen to have any references for them? Any help in referencing anything else on the page would be much appreciated. Thanks and best regards. Woody (talk) 21:31, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bannanhk.jpg

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Bannanhk.jpg has been speedily deleted because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:28, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dominik Hofbauer

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dominik Hofbauer, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Player fails WP:ATHLETE as has never played in a fully-pro league.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Giant Snowman 13:35, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aston Villa F.C. Reserves and Academy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nathan Baker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Derrick Williams (footballer), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages USA national football team and American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jonaldinho2004. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Club infobox dates

Hi, when updating club infobox stats you should update the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 20:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jonaldinho2004. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]