User talk:Jonathanfaulkner

External images

External images my not be used in Wikipedia articles, as you attempted to do at Naomi (wrestler). Please stop. General Ization ^Talk 01:54, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathanfaulkner, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jonathanfaulkner! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Paul Van Dale

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Paul Van Dale requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CataracticPlanets (talk) 02:54, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Absolution (a professional wrestling stable) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Absolution (a professional wrestling stable), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 19:16, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jordan Levine, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Gorthian (talk) 02:40, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DenisDaily

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DenisDaily, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:45, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Multiverse Flash

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Multiverse Flash requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dr. Neurosis (talk) 21:55, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Paul Van Dale

Hello, Jonathanfaulkner. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Paul Van Dale, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 12:10, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Paul Van Dale

Hello, Jonathanfaulkner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paul Van Dale".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Nikki♥311 20:41, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of DenisDaily

Hello, Jonathanfaulkner. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, DenisDaily, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want DenisDaily to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Slatersteven (talk) 15:40, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve DenisDaily

Thanks for creating DenisDaily.

A New Page Patroller Slatersteven just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

I am being generous,. YouTube is not an RS.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slatersteven (talk) 18:36, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IS this article in fact a joke? seriously all you have done is add unsourced and pointless trivia.Slatersteven (talk) 19:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DenisDaily

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DenisDaily requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 12:53, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about DenisDaily

Hello, Jonathanfaulkner,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether DenisDaily should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DenisDaily .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Slatersteven (talk) 16:39, 7 November 2018 (UTC) At least bother to add one reliable source if you are going to try and recreate this. All you are going to achieve by behavior like this is a block.Slatersteven (talk) 16:40, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LOve?

You say on your user page how you love to edit Wikipedia, yet you added this to another users page [[1]], which is a gross policy violation. Now why would you do thisd if you want to edit here, (please see WP:IDENTIFYUNCIVIL). Slatersteven (talk) 16:52, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Boss 'N' Hug Connection

Hello, Jonathanfaulkner,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bensci54 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Boss 'N' Hug Connection, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bensci54}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 17:14, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Boss 'N' Hug Connection for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boss 'N' Hug Connection is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boss 'N' Hug Connection until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 21:56, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Absolution (professional wrestling) (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NotTheFakeJTP was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Meets WP:PWSTABLE, but many changes need to be made; add an infobox, improve the lead, remove the "Other media" and "Personal life" sections (only needed if they appear in something together), use a reference other than PWInsider. Feel free to ask WT:PW for advice.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Absolution (professional wrestling) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Absolution (professional wrestling), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:44, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I made several changes to the article based on comments by NotTheFakeJTP and other fixes. One of the glaring issues I have with the way it currently is set up is Absolution was listed as being current, which the article contradicts. I feel it would be better as a Mandy Rose and Sonya Deville article and Absolution can work as the redirect to it. Also I would say it needs some more info on the Money in the Bank info and how Sonya gave Mandy the spot and tried carrying her up the ladder. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 13:20, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]