User talk:JorgePeixoto/Archive 2
Appearance
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Thanks for your e-mail
It's always nice to meet another XKCD fan. :) This is a pretty relevant one too (I'm pretty sure people have actually done that now). Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 02:22, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for understanding and for answering. Regards, Jorge Peixoto (talk) 13:50, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Catholic categories
Did you already go to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion? NYyankees51 (talk) 03:56, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, the discussion over there isn't getting a lot of participants, and still fewer who weren't already involved! I came over here to ask the same thing, basically: where do you think we should take it next in the hope of more input? (It might be a bit complicated for CfD, but we could give it a try. Or an RfC or something?) Or should we just assume we're good and start working on putting the plan into action? –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:12, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'm looking at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion. I'm reading the rules over there. -- Jorge Peixoto (talk) 20:50, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
- Can you do that for me (read the rules at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion and then make a proposal)? I'm too busy with study. -- Jorge Peixoto (talk) 20:44, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'm looking at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion. I'm reading the rules over there. -- Jorge Peixoto (talk) 20:50, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
:(
"A long trail of discontent - often testing the authority of the church - led up to the cause celebre." - JP, this is plagiarism. I thought we talked about this. (Also see the discussion on the talk page about due weight, but that's a separate issue.) –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:13, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry. I lacked attention. Is it better now? -- Jorge Peixoto (talk) 01:33, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- Also unrelatedly, may I recommend rephrasing your most recent edit? It gives the impression that O'Rourke was an ex-Jesuit at the time, which is incorrect. If you feel it is important that that first sentence convey that he later ceased to be a Jesuit (which is explained later in the paragraph), perhaps it could be phrased as "Joseph O'Rourke, then a Jesuit priest" or "Joseph O'Rourke, who at the time was a Jesuit priest." –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:18, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- Done. -- Jorge Peixoto (talk) 01:33, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- The changes you've made look good. (As I said, I still think it's way too much coverage of this event, but that's a separate issue.) And I'm generally not too far from the computer if you need English-related help, so let me know (I don't speak Portuguese, but I'll see what I can do with Italian/French similarities...). –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 02:16, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- Done. -- Jorge Peixoto (talk) 01:33, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Ichthus: January 2012
![]() |
ICHTHUS |
January 2012 |
In this issue...
Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |