Jump to content

User talk:Joselv83/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Acknowledgements[edit]

Thank you all for your Reviews, it is greatly appreciated!

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback[edit]

Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:Angela Sandy
Date of review 5/13/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Joselv83
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joselv83/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/13/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/13/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) The length of the article is good length
Image (needed/appropriate) n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) The review of the textbook is accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed n/a
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) The article is accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting The formatting is good
Grammar & composition Good grammar & composition
Other comments Good work!

Angela Sandy (talk) 02:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback[edit]

Name of student reviewer: User: Cgchapman Replace with username for version on talk page**


Date of review: 05/10/2013


Name of editor: User: Joselv83 Replace with username for version on talk page**


URL of editor’s Userpage:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joselv83/sandbox


Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/10/2013


Date review submitted to instructor:


Length of edit (too long/too short): Good length


Image (needed/appropriate): Not needed


Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Edit information accurate to textbook


Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: N/A


Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Edit information accurate and relevant to I/O Psychology


Wikiformatting: Good Formatting


Grammar & composition: Good grammer


Other comments:None


Cgchapman (talk) 15:56, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback[edit]

--Keronica Grant (talk) 18:45, 9 May 2013 (UTC) |}[reply]


Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User: Keronica Grant
Date of review 5/9/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Joselv83
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joselv83/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/8/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/8/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) good length
Image (needed/appropriate) n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Primary
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting good formatting
Grammar & composition Good grammar.
Other comments Good edit!

--Keronica Grant (talk) 05:08, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback[edit]

Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:Neffateriet
Date of review 5/8/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Joselv83
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joselv83/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/8/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/8/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) good length
Image (needed/appropriate) n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting OK format but more can be add
Grammar & composition Good grammar. perfect.
Other comments Good idea for an edit, but add bullets for more points

Neffateriet (talk) 9:36, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback[edit]

Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:Azahur
Date of review 5/8/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Joselv83
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joselv83/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/8/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/8/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) good length for the article
Image (needed/appropriate) n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting OK format but more can be add
Grammar & composition Good grammar. perfect.
Other comments Good edit

Azahur (talk) 04:50, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback[edit]

Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User: VIMMYSEAJATAN
Date of review 5/9/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Joselv83
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joselv83/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/9/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) okay
Image (needed/appropriate) n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Primary
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting good formatting
Grammar & composition Good grammar. Look at the "training" sentence a letter is missing from one of the words.
Other comments Good edit!

-- Vimmy (talk) 19:05, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback[edit]

Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User: VIMMYSEAJATAN
Date of review 5/9/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Joselv83
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joselv83/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/9/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) good
Image (needed/appropriate) n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Primary
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting good formatting used bullet points
Grammar & composition Good grammar.
Other comments Good edit! (This review is for Psychological testing).

Vimmy (talk) 19:35, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback[edit]

Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User: F.Moshammad
Date of review 5/10/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Joselv83
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joselv83/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/10/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/10/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) appropriate length
Image (needed/appropriate) n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate to text book information
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Primary
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting good formatting
Grammar & composition Good grammar.
Other comments Good job!

F.Moshammad (talk) 05:24, 10 May 2013 (UTC


Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback[edit]

Name of student reviewer: Alyssa Bhagwandin

Date of review: 5/15/2013

Name of editor Wikipedia User: Wikipedia User: Joselv83

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joselv83/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/15/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 05/15/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): Length was good wasn’t too short or long

Image (needed/appropriate): N/A

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): information from the text was accurate

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes it is adherent to I/O Psychology

Wikiformatting: good formatting

Grammar & composition: grammar and composition was good

Other comments: good job!

User:A_Bhagwandin (talk)