User talk:Joshua BishopRoby

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Dear Joshua BishopRoby: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD!

Hi! You've added {{RPG}} to a lot of RPG articles. That template isn't for RPG articles in general, but rather for the "RPG series" of articles; that is, the ones mentioned on the template. I'm removing it from the pages you've added it to.

Thanks for your other contributions, though, and welcome to Wikipedia! Percy Snoodle 15:27, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And thus I am a reformed wikipedian. Joshua BishopRoby 22:01, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MI7 (clan)[edit]

This was a non-notable group of people as per the criteria set out in WP:BIO. (aeropagitica) 21:24, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I calved them off from the main MI7 article. They didn't especially belong there, either. -- Joshua BishopRoby 21:37, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Ronin publishing (psychedelia)

A tag has been placed on Ronin publishing (psychedelia), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dan0 00 01:58, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whittier, California[edit]

You did a great job editing the recently added controvery section [1] that was added to the Whittier, California article. ^Blank ^Verse 14:01, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

E. Lucy Braun[edit]

Hi. The Emma Lucy Braun page which you created in Oct 06 is an important page; thanks for creating it. But it has been from the very beginning an outright copy of the Encarta page, and therefore in violation of copyright. Please consider a new start on the page, since it is important. CHE 17:57, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Minor" edits[edit]

You seem to be marking all of your edits as minor. I can see you've been around a while so I figure it's just a mistake under your preferences, but I wanted to let you know. Kafziel ^Talk 01:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Joshua BishopRoby! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 937 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Clinton R. Nixon - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vincent Baker[edit]

The article Vincent Baker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no independent sources; notability not asserted

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SlimVirgin ^{talk|contribs} 00:51, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clinton R. Nixon[edit]

The article Clinton R. Nixon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced and tagged for last 2 years and no evidence of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tracer9999 (talk) 03:20, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:50, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Big Model for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Big Model is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Big Model until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SarahStierch (talk) 06:11, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]