Jump to content

User talk:Juan de Leon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia[edit]

Hello, Juan de Leon! Welcome to Wikipedia! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. In addition, you can also have me set you up with a suitable adoptor, but only at your wish. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Sincerely, ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 15:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

AfD nomination of Magellan (book)[edit]

I have nominated Magellan (book), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magellan (book). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ukexpat (talk) 04:10, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ukexpat, somebody appears to have provided the information you required concerning Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. --Juan de Leon (talk) 08:11, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Magellan (book)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Magellan (book) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 12:52, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Magellan (book)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Magellan (book) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 12:55, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of General Tojo (talk • contribs • block log • creation log).  As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Further comments: Blocked by Alison ❤ 12:57, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Juan de Leon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am nobody but myself. No valid reason reason has been given for the banning. There is only a very tenuous link between a historical book review of a sixteenth century discoverer - to a publisher - to who is probably merely an accountant for a web site - to a banned member who is a specialist in Parkinson's Disease ! This is ridiculous. Please explain how "General Tojo" can be a specialist in Parkinson's Disease and suddenly becomes a publisher of sixteenth century Portuguese history, and how my merely adding details of a biography of Magellan makes me General Tojo. There is an IP range for General Tojo that is far removed from mine. If necessary I can add my IP address to conclusively prove the difference. Please unblock rather than use completely arbitray and unjustified banning against anybody who merely disagrees. --Juan de Leon (talk) 13:03, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicated request, see below. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 14:49, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Admins: - now  Confirmed by checkuser - Alison ❤ 13:06, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Juan de Leon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is no confirmation by checkuser. It has merely been requested. If you want to verify that I am not the banned editor, we can check that editors known IP range with mine. Can an independent administrator please assess the very tenuous evidence objectively.

Decline reason:

Many checkusers are done without a formal request. If Alison says it's confirmed, it's confirmed. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Juan de Leon (talk) 13:16, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have not been able to provide a shred of evidence in support of what you have written. Claiming somebody you don't even know to be an infallible source of information is sheer stupidity, or is it bias ? --Juan de Leon (talk) 15:56, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser result[edit]

For the record, as I am a checkuser here, it is  Confirmed that the following accounts are one and the same, given that they've edited from the same IP address at the same time, and share many other characteristics. IP location correlates closely with Tojo's location, so it's pretty obvious what's happening here, expecially given the exhortations of "check my IP / I know what Tojo's range is".

  1. Juan de Leon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  2. H.M.Revenue (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  3. Jan Van Leer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Alison ❤ 16:45, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Juan_de_Leon&oldid=1144576281"