User talk:June42

This user is a student editor in Georgetown_University/Communication_Theory_&_Frameworks_(Fall) .

Welcome![edit]

Hello, June42, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:48, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review 1 - Media Complementarity Theory (MCP)[edit]

I think the draft is well-organized and carefully structured -- I can tell the editor spend a lot of efforts on it. Yet you may consider to improve the structure, transition and content.

1. structure:

I think the overview part is oversize. Ideally, overview should briefly introduce the basic concept, theory founders, key elements and typical application -- by saying briefly I mean only 1-2 sentences for each part.

However, the overview I saw in the draft are filled by too many sub-headings. They should be at removed and fit into news sessions parallel with the overview + History & Background: This part should become an parallel setion + Theoretical Basis,Assumptions,Research Strategies: these parts should belong to the "theoretical framework" section. + Limitation: I think this part belongs to the "Critique" section. ( And "limitations" is the correct writing?)

2. Transition

I think you did a good job in transiting the headings -- they works well. So I will focus on the transition in the leading section.

One thing I notice is the abbreviation of "Media complementarity theory". It should first present inside parentheses following the full name in the first sentence.

Another thing is topic sentence of the second paragraph:"Using data collected by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press" is irrelevant to the topic, so I think you should just keep the " MCT provides an alternative explanation to relationship between media types" part. In the following sentences, I can see you are trying to make a comparison between MCT and other theory, but the intention is not clearly indicated. Are "media treatment as a 'homogeneous entities' or a 'zero-sum game' part of the “competition-based displacement”? I think you would like to consider putting a transition here to specify.

Content

I really look forward the comparison between the MCT and other media theories -- both traditional ones and contemporary ones. I searched some literature and it looks like there are already some researches in the comparison. You mentioned it in the leading section, and it may be perfect if you develop one more section to talk about further details.

Recommended Reference: ^[1] ^[2]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Media complementarity theory (February 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

Vr\ery incomplete

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Media complementarity theory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Media complementarity theory, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 06:18, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, June42! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 06:18, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Media complementarity theory concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Media complementarity theory, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Media complementarity theory[edit]

Hello, June42. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Media complementarity theory".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:33, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

^ Tian, Yan, and Robinson, James D. “Incidental Health Information Use and Media Complementarity: A Comparison of Senior and Non-Senior Cancer Patients.” Patient Education and Counseling 71.3 (2008): 340–344. Web.
^ Michele Tantardini. (2019) Routine and nonroutine performance information: an assessment about substitution and complementarity. Public Management Review 21:5, pages 755-774.

[1] Tian, Yan, and Robinson, James D. “Incidental Health Information Use and Media Complementarity: A Comparison of Senior and Non-Senior Cancer Patients.” Patient Education and Counseling 71.3 (2008): 340–344. Web.

[2] Michele Tantardini. (2019) Routine and nonroutine performance information: an assessment about substitution and complementarity. Public Management Review 21:5, pages 755-774.

[1]

[2]