User talk:JungLiao

Welcome![edit]

Hello, JungLiao, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 06:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Jerry Siegel, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 05:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jim1138: Much apologies, in retrospect I see that was not a good edit. JungLiao (talk) 06:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jim1138: What do you think of the edits I made to the main body of the article? My edits there were very substantial, which is why I didn't write explanations, because there was just too much to explain. JungLiao (talk) 09:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SPI[edit]

You are the subject of a sockpuppet investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kurzon. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:16, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note that at least two of your block-evading anon IPs have also been included in the SPI. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:45, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've noted at the SPI, "Today, User:JungLiao confirmed he is 78.129.111.57. JungLiao's edit here is identical to 78.129.111.57's edit here."

Your attempts at block-evasion, using yet another registered-user name plus anon IPs, constitute blatant block-evading and misuse of accounts. There must be some way now to get you banned permanently.-- Tenebrae (talk) 18:08, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked your account for a month as block evasion for User:Kurzon, per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:55, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

False accusation[edit]

Kurzon / BaronBifford / JungLiao: Your false accusation against me here claiming that I was edit-warring, despite multiple editors reverting you and your anon-IP socks' obvious block-evasion, has boomeranged. Do not block-evade and do not use sockpuppets, both of which may well get you banned. And, certainly, do not make false accusations against me again. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:36, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abusing multiple accounts[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at WP:AN3. See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Kurzon. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:26, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Changed this block of JungLiao to an indefinite block per a request at WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Kurzon. Same rationale as above. EdJohnston (talk) 03:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]