User talk:Jurvetson2

Welcome!

Hello, Jurvetson2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Wowd, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gonzonoir (talk) 15:01, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wowd[edit]

A tag has been placed on Wowd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Gonzonoir (talk) 15:01, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Intro section[edit]

Hello.

You started an article with this:

The zeta of any number that can be expressed as 2^a, here denoted as x, multiplied by another number, here denoted as y, will be equal to π to the power of x.

That neglects to tell the lay reader at the outset that mathematics is what this is about. At the very least, that much is needed. Michael Hardy (talk) 03:05, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Perfect number. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. You were copying one of the definitions given at the start of the article, but you incorrectly stated that "p is a Mersenne prime", when it is actually (2^p)-1 itself (p must be a prime number, however) Glenn L (talk) 03:13, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of How long will it take for this page to get deleted[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. E♴ (talk) 17:54, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can stop now. Dloh cierekim 18:04, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of I seriously wonder how long it will it take for this page to be nominated for deletion[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. E♴ (talk) 17:56, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

<1 minute. Dloh cierekim 18:02, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletions[edit]

Please, do not delete neither the informative semiprotection templates from semiprotected articles, nor important source comments like the one in the Pi article instituted by consensus of other editors.—Emil J. 18:31, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Kushamaya, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Sally the Sunflower[edit]

Hello Jurvetson2. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sally the Sunflower, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. You need to use one of the standard tags listed at WP:CSD - if you can't find one that fits, that probably means the article is not speediable. The criteria are deliberately tightly drawn, and anything like this, which doesn't clearly fit one of them, has to go to PROD or AfD. There is good advice for speedy taggers at WP:10CSD and WP:A7M. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:29, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to 1724 Vladimir has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 21:45, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Boucard's Wren constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 21:46, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of This is a deleted page[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on This is a deleted page requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. First Light (talk) 03:22, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 8589869056[edit]

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on 8589869056, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hang on}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Acabashi (talk) 21:24, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About the creation of Perfect number articles[edit]

Hey, what is the idea behind the creation of 33550336 and 8589869056? Sure, they are perfect numbers, but is there anything else to tell about them which is not already covered in perfect number? How do you plan to expand these articles? Yoenit (talk) 21:39, 27 February 2011 (UTC) Maybe the same way 8128 was? 8128 was created just because it was perfect.[reply]

The first criteria under Integers in Wikipedia's notability standards for numbers is that an integer with its own article should have at least three unrelated mathematical properties. I don't believe 33550336 or 8589869056 meet this criteria, and so I think these articles should be deleted. I have raised this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics#Perfect number articles to determine the views of other editors. Gandalf61 (talk) 09:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, 33550336[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, 33550336. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Perfect Number. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Perfect Number - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 21:54, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at 33550336[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from 33550336, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:57, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Happy Perfect Numbers[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Happy Perfect Numbers, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Phearson (talk) 00:30, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Happy Perfect Numbers[edit]

The article Happy Perfect Numbers has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PrimeHunter (talk) 02:00, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Happy Perfect Numbers for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Happy Perfect Numbers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happy Perfect Numbers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PrimeHunter (talk) 03:02, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My OR calculation shows that 9 of the 47 known perfect numbers are happy numbers, 2^p−1×(2^p−1) for

p = 3, 5, 7, 107, 2281, 21701, 6972593, 20996011, 42643801.

The first 8 are known to be the first even happy perfect numbers. PrimeHunter (talk) 04:41, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

None of those are perfect numbers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jurvetson2 (talk • contribs)

I wrote "2^p−1×(2^p−1) for p = ..." They are all perfect numbers. This is the formula for even perfect numbers. p itself is obviously not a perfect number. p has to be prime. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:54, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That is the formula for MERSENNE primes, not all primes. The ONLY perfect numbers less than 10,000,000,000 are 6,28,496,8128,3355036,and one more — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jurvetson2 (talk • contribs)

2^p−1×(2^p−1) is a product and clearly not a formula for primes. It is Euclid's famous formula for even perfect numbers. 2^p−1 is the formula for Mersenne primes. I can hardly believe I apparently have to write this out without using variables but the 9 perfect happy numbers are:

2²×(2³-1), 2⁴×(2⁵-1), 2⁶×(2⁷-1), 2¹⁰⁶×(2¹⁰⁷-1), 2²²⁸⁰×(2²²⁸¹-1), 2²¹⁷⁰⁰×(2²¹⁷⁰¹-1), 2^6972592×(2^6972593-1), 2^20996010×(2^20996011-1), 2^42643800×(2^42643801-1).

The decimal expansion of the first four are 28, 496, 8128, 13164036458569648337239753460458722910223472318386943117783728128. The rest have from 1373 to 25674127 digits so please don't make me post the decimal expansions. PrimeHunter (talk) 02:27, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ClueBot[edit]

A tag has been placed on ClueBot, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 18:00, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ClueBot[edit]

Redirects from article space to user space are not allowed. Please don't do that again. You seem to be creating a lot of articles that are getting speedy deleted. You've been here long enough to know better. Please stop. --Selket ^Talk 19:02, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Jurvetson2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

71.131.200.213 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Thisaccountisasockpuppet". The reason given for Thisaccountisasockpuppet's block is: {{uw-ublock}}.

Blocking administrator: Brookie (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: I don't see why we should unblock the IP when Thisaccountisasockpuppet (talk · contribs) is clearly your account. Please review our policy on multiple accounts. The autoblock currently in effect should wear off in 24 hours. TN X Man 14:21, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am now unable to edit any articles because of that user on my network, Thisaccountisasockpuppet. It is obvious that that account is meant to be used as a prank, and cannot be a real sockpuppet, because as far as I know, there are no other accounts under this shared IP address.

August 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:ClueBot NG/Run. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Damian Zaremba ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:56, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From reading this page, it becomes clear that you're using wikipedia for experimenting. Please stop. Materialscientist (talk) 23:33, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zack Chroman[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Zack Chroman, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 01:52, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

(please do not unblock without notifying me) Materialscientist (talk) 03:09, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is carbon fiber listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect What is carbon fiber. Since you had some involvement with the What is carbon fiber redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Traditionalist (talk) 14:51, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]